Preetikasharma

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preetikasharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead;Preetikasharma (talk) 11:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were not blocked just for "editing the dead links", you were blocked for replacing links with blatant advertising for a cake business in India. Your unblock request and your answer below don't demonstrate any recognition of that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Will you please explain what you are actually blocked for, and explain what productive contributions you would make if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

  I have blocked for editing the dead links. I did not had idea about wiki policies. For future I will keep wiki policies in my mind and will update original content only. Please unblock my account. Preetikasharma (talk) 11:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preetikasharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not had idea that this is a wrong way to do that. I am new to wikipedia but I'll take care of this in the future.Preetikasharma (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Are you really, honestly, telling us that you thought it was acceptable to use a free online encyclopedia to advertise your cake business, and to do it by replacing dead links in articles with links to your business (which is a common promotional spamming technique)? And you have still not told us specifically what you want to do here other than advertise your business. You say you "will update original content only" - please give us an example. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)