Welcome! edit

Hi Prashank321! I noticed your contributions to Diamond Foundry and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Happy editing! PrisonerB (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

KGK Group moved to draftspace. Unsourced. UPE Concerns. Best route is AFC edit

An article you recently created, KGK Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (July 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 10:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Prashank321! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 10:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

 

Hello Prashank321. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Prashank321. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Prashank321|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.


I am not reciving any compensation for edits in this article and not in any ways related to that. I researched about this article over internet and found this as the topic to be contributed over wikipedia as an informative articel i made the changes as request to add more citation links to get submitted for review. Kindly please have look to this article and suggest me what is more to be required. I will be contributing other articles and edits over wikipedia to make it more neutral and informative platform for all.

Your answer above confirms not paid or otherwise compensated. Are you an employee? That would count as paid even if not being paid specifically to create an article. Do you have any personal connection to the company or the family that founded the company? That would qualify as a conflict of interest, which must be declared on your User page. David notMD (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
David notMD I am not associated with company and also not having personal connection i found this topic on article research and i know about this business as its from my location. Let me know if you want to know anything further.

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (August 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (August 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (October 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (October 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 02:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KGK Group (November 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still does not meet WP:NCORP.
S0091 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Kgk group edit

 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Kgk group has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. firefly ( t · c ) 11:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of KGK Group edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KGK Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of KGK Group edit

 

The page KGK Group has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G11: this would require a fundamental rewrite, I am not moving it to draftspace as this page creator has been already working on Draft:KGK and getting it constantly reviewed

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:KGK edit

  Hello, Prashank321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KGK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:KGK edit

 

Hello, Prashank321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KGK".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply