Prash2000
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jamie Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melbury Capital.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jamie Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 10:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Jamie Reuben edit
Thanks for following up with me about this article. It was a bit confusing for me because your title refers to "Jamie" Reuben and your article refers to "James" Reuben, and your references are all taken form the Reuben brothers website that only refers to the work of David and Simon Reuben. First, even if your references had been about James or Jamie, which they weren't, making reference to a family owned website is not considered to be an "independent, third party, reliable" source for a wikipedia article. You will need to cite references that actually speak about your subject, clear up the name problem, and cite your references using Inline citations so that any reader can go to the source material to verify what you have included in your article. I hope this helps. Best Regards, Snowysusan 14:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
James Reuben edit
Hi Prash. I got your message and have changed the name of the article as requested. I will look the rest this evening and get back to you! Snowysusan 21:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
James Reuben edit
Hi Prash. Sorry I didn't get back to you when I had hoped. My day job has been a bit hectic. I see that someone answered your help request in the meantime. I have looked at the article again and it's great that you found the Evening Standard article but that is your only independent source of information. All of the other sources are connected to the subject of your article and even that one is partly based on information he provides during the interview.
Unfortunately, I don't think most reviewers will find one independent source of information to be enough to establish notability. I would also try to actually incorporate some of the information from that article into your own and then footnote it. The same article appears at http://www.standard.co.uk/news/the-dispossessed-as-a-result-of-this-campaign-we-cant-ever-forget-about-london-poor-6502973.html There is also a bit about him at http://oakpartnerslondon.com/wp/our-team/ but again it's not an independent source. You will need to locate more independent sources somewhere. If you read the criteria at notable persons you will see what I mean. Here's part of it:
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published[1] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[2] and independent of the subject.[3]
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[4]
- Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
I encourage you to continue to work on the article if you can find these types of sources. Maybe the archives sections of some of the London papers?
Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 07:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand? edit
|
Hello! Prash2000,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
|
Talkback edit
Message added 20:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SarahStierch (talk) 20:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 18:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SarahStierch (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rcsprinter (talk) @ 17:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melbury Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission James Reuben edit
Hello Prash2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled James Reuben.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Reuben}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melbury Capital edit
Hello Prash2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Melbury Capital".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melbury Capital}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 05:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest edit
Hello, Prash2000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article David and Simon Reuben, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- ^ What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.
- ^ Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.
- ^ Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the Marquis Who's Who) do not prove notability.
- ^ Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail. A credible 200-page independent biography of a person that covers that person's life in detail is non-trivial, whereas a birth certificate or a 1-line listing on an election ballot form is not. Database sources such as Notable Names Database, Internet Movie Database and Internet Adult Film Database are not considered credible since they are, like wikis, mass-edited with little oversight. Additionally, these databases have low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion.