PoopMoney923

May 2023

Hello, I'm Zsinj. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Benty Grange helmet—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Zsinj^Talk 23:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1991 São Toméan legislative election. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1991 São Toméan legislative election was changed by PoopMoney923 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852356 on 2023-05-04T00:01:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Euryalus (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoopMoney923 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia, this is my original account that was blocked. I wish to appeal this account because I discovered that creating new accounts while blocked is rule breaking - (It is called Sockpuppeting). I was unaware of this until recently when a new account I created was banned for that reason, and I looked to see what sock puppeting meant. I also wish you create a new username as my current one references fecal matter, which violates the username policy, and it caused me to be blocked on a sock puppet account. The Sock Puppet accounts are PoopMoney23 and PoopMoney623 (Keep those accounts blocked). Thank You.

Decline reason:

We'll keep this one blocked too, as all of its edits have been juvenile vandalism. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PoopMoney923 (talk) 15:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I will no longer make unconstructive edits. PoopMoney923 (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)