Politoman
Welcome!
Hello, Politoman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dr Aaij (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Safeword (sports) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I do believe citations for an individual on a national scale would count them as notable, but I guess notoriety is left up to speculation. My justification for saying this is, walk on any street in the United States and I could bet that 50% of people you ask do not know who Bobby Fischer or Eli Whitney, Jr. are, but does that make them any less notable to the 50% that do —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therightwing (talk • contribs) 23:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Anthony rios edit
Hi. I had already tagged Anthony rios for deletion for the copyvio. There wasn't really any need to put any other tags on it, and in doing so you hid the deletion tag! —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Tag bombing edit
FYI, adding a ton of tags like this is generally unproductive and discouraged. If it has 2-3 relevant tags already, there's probably no need to add more: readers and editors already know the article has problems. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)