Poetryanarchists

Welcome!

Hello, Poetryanarchists, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Poetry anarchists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! West Eddy (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poetry anarchists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poetry anarchists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Poetry anarchists

The article Poetry anarchists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced essay; original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello Poetryanarchists. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poetry anarchists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poetry anarchists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 02:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a free host for promotion. All material must be verifiable and covered in reliable third-party sources. All subjects are subject to the notability guidelines: see WP:NOTE. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Poetry Anarchists Troubles

Hello. I saw your post on the Poetry Anarchist talk page. Yes, you got it exactly, you need to provide reliable sources from outside of Wikipedia. Here are a few links for you to look over:

• Writing your first article: WP:YFA
• Citations: WP:CITE
• Sources: WP:SOURCE
• General Notability Guideline: WP:GNG
• Wikipedia:Teahouse, which is a place for new editors to find help from more experienced ones.
• Since your user name is the same as the article you were trying to create, you should also read WP:COI. Conflicts of interest are common, but they have special problems attached.

It's a lot to take in, and it can seem confusing and bureaucratic, to be sure. If you have any more questions, leave a comment on my talk page, and I will try my best, or you can just put {{helpme}} on this page and someone will be around to help you. Thank you for contributing. No, really, thank you! Grayfell (talk) 03:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

More specifically, for a subject to be considered notable it must have been covered in a somewhat substantial way by major third-party media, since Wikipedia is a secondary source and requires that material be verifiable by reference to sources that have already noticed the subject and documented it, giving a threshold of notability. This would normally require newspaper articles, preferably on a national or near-national scale (local coverage doesn't usually satisfy notability). If The Age or the Sydney Morning Herald have articles, that would go a long way. Since this is apparently an organization that has become active in the last week, it would be hard for it to establish notability, and it appears to me that you're trying to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. It's the other way around, Wikipedia notes significant subjects that have been documented in other media. Also, you appear to have a conflict of interest, which makes it difficult for you to have an appropriate editorial distance between yourself and the subject. Acroterion (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Poetryanarchists. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 13:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual.
 
Additionally, it appears your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest, though you may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

See also WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)