User talk:Plasma east/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Minor edits?
Hey, it looks like all your recent edits are marked as minor edits. But many are not simple typo/formatting fixes or changes. If your user preferences are set to mark all edits as minor, maybe that should be turned off. Review WP:MINOR if needed. Keep up the good work. I'll check back here if you want to reply. Thanks. -fnlayson (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC) Done
Merry, merry
Done
Happy, happy
Done
Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority
- Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
- You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
- If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC) Done
Category:Rail lines in Utah
Just to let you know, you haven't finished the consideration for deletion. Need to click "add entry" on the article to submit it to the deletion page. Bgwhite (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Done
Question about "Light Rail in New York" category.
I don't see that light rail is mentioned in this article, with no construction work started or completed in Rochester.
I noted that you modified the category of "Light Rail" to reflect "New York" being more appropriate.
Do you think the category of "Light Rail" or "Light Rail in New York" is warranted?
--Allamericanbear (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Just checked it and you're correct it likely doesn't. I'm not sure why it was ever included in "Light Rail" so I'll remove it from the "Light Rail in New York" category. Plasma east (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC) Done
Rapid Transit cats
I've got to give you credit, because you're really kicking some ass tonight. Not only did you split the PANY-NJ AirTrain category, but you made state-specific rapid transit station categories. I've been looking to have separate MBTA Station categories by type for a while, and I think AirTrain Newark needs their own station templates now. Keep up the good work. ----DanTD (talk) 03:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks - the Category:Rapid transit in the United States was getting a bit cluttered. I've also split out Category:Rapid transit stations in the United States but not sure if I got them all. Plasma east (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Done
Empty or single-page Categories
Hi, I wanted to know what is the point of creating arborescence of categories for 1 single article...
Inside the "Category:Transport in Macau", there is now:
- Public transport in Macau (1C)
- Passenger rail transport in Macau (1C)
- Light rail in Macau (1P)
- Passenger rail transport in Macau (1C)
There is also:
- Rail transport in Macau (1 C)
- Passenger rail transport in Macau (1C)
- Light rail in Macau (1P)
- Passenger rail transport in Macau (1C)
So if I am looking for the page Macau Light Rail Transit by browing the category Transport in Macau, I will not find it until I expand twice the public transport or the rail transport...
This arborescence may be good for countries with a developped rail network but Macao isn't, believe me, actually the LRT there hasn't started yet... but that is another story.
--Pignoof (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Looking back and with your input, I agree - 2 categories too far. I was basing it somewhat on the Hong Kong categories but wasn't sure if Macau had further potential for light rail, passenger rail or rail transport articles.Plasma east (talk) 21:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Done
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Intermodal transportation authorities in Canada
Category:Intermodal transportation authorities in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Done
Category:Underground rapid transit in Finland
While I appreciate your interest in my home country, I have to ask what is the point in creating the category Category:Underground rapid transit in Finland when the Helsinki Metro is the only underground rapid transit system Finland has ever had, and the only likely change in the near future is the ongoing expansion to the neighbouring city of Espoo. JIP | Talk 21:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Minor edits and edit summaries
Hi,
You did a nice job with your improvements to the Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway article. Just curious: is there a reason why you mark all of your edits as minor? Many of your edits were not minor in nature, and as such should not be marked as minor edits. Also, if you could provide an Edit Summary before saving your edits, that would be enormously helpful to your fellow editors. Thanks and happy editing, BMRR (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Disused railway stations in Canada
Category:Disused railway stations in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
PEI lot locator map congruence
Your Lot 63 map and Lot 64 map for PEI both show Lot 64. Thanks. — AjaxSmack 21:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK thanks - I'll try to get it fixed. Plasma east (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
RCN, RCAF
Please be careful with edits such as this not to introduce anachronisms. While they were once and are again called the RCN/RCAF, at the time of interest for this article they were not, as reflected in the cited sources. Otherwise, it's a nice edit. Cheers.LeadSongDog come howl! 18:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK thanks for the heads up.Plasma east (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
NF Railway logo?
Hello. I'm not sure of what your source is, but would it be possible to get the old style NF logo in a vector art format? Perhaps an EPS or SVG?
Thanks!
CSC 204.97.135.30 (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I don't have a vector. It was scanned from an old timetable. Plasma east (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Plasma east! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Re move Comd RCN to CMS
See User talk:Geoff NoNick#Comd RCN. MARGEN 036-11 is not publicly available but there is no reason to doubt the editor's word. I was myself surprised at the name change and the drop of the CMS title. — CharlieEchoTango — 18:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks - didn't see the discussion before I made the change. No issues here if this change in the appointment's title has been made. Plasma east (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well the issue is that the article is inaccurate since CMS is not the title anymore, the page needs to be moved back to where it was moved by Geoff NoNick in this edit. I just wanted to let you know before doing it. :) Best, — CharlieEchoTango — 18:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll move it back. Checked the Senior Appointments list here and it is called Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy DSA Vice-Admiral Maddison Plasma east (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I see that it's been reverted - thanks.Plasma east (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll move it back. Checked the Senior Appointments list here and it is called Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy DSA Vice-Admiral Maddison Plasma east (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well the issue is that the article is inaccurate since CMS is not the title anymore, the page needs to be moved back to where it was moved by Geoff NoNick in this edit. I just wanted to let you know before doing it. :) Best, — CharlieEchoTango — 18:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Maps of PEI
Hi,
I see that all the maps like: "Map of Prince Edward Island highlighting Lot 1.png" are nor in the Commons, could you move them to the Commons, so that a newbie like me could reach them. I'm afraid to make a mistake while moving them.
I need them there so that I can reach them from the french wikipedia, I do a lot of translation.
Thanks, vir cotto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vir cotto (talk • contribs) 10:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look into how to do it - I've never placed anything in the Commons before so might take a few days.Plasma east (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
mistake
Hi Plasma east, I am just beginning to update an organization page and removed a redirect from Northeastern_Seminary to Roberts_Wesleyan_College. When I tried to put it back in it did not allow me to. I will providing good content soon but need some time to put it all together. Can you put back in place the original redirect? Jpa0325 (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- The redirect is back in place. Plasma east (talk) 15:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy armed yachts
Category:Royal Canadian Navy armed yachts, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy hydrofoils
Category:Royal Canadian Navy hydrofoils, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canadian Forces hydrofoils
Category:Canadian Forces hydrofoils, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
fyi
I requested a history merge of Arctic Patrol Ship and Arctic Patrol Ship Project. Geo Swan (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks for the fyi. Plasma east (talk) 03:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- New Brunswick Southern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links to Woodland, Maine and Saint John River
- Maine Northern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link to Saint John River
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Corrected. Thanks! Plasma east (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Future Canadian Amphibious Assault Ship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Pratt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Corrected. Thanks! Plasma east (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Horizon Health Network, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St. Joseph's Hospital and Waterville, New Brunswick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant LHIN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to St. Joseph’s Hospital, St. Peter's Hospital and Hotel Dieu Hospital
- South West LHIN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to St. Joseph's Hospital and Victoria Hospital
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Toronto Central LHIN, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mount Sinai Hospital and Providence Healthcare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Windsor, Nova Scotia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mi'kmaq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited CFB Kingston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Defence College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2
Hi. When you recently edited HMS Hind (1749), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories
Please don't move categories by creating a new category, moving the contents from the existing category to the new one, and then deleting/nominating for deletion the old one. This is out of process; moves should be done by nominating the existing category for renaming or merging at CfD. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Commander of the Canadian Army?
While I agree with you that the above title might sound better, (and even "Commander, Canadian Army" seems more grammatically correct), I could find no source to support either. The only source I could find was this one (and its subordinate link). Do you have a source for your change? Sunray (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This note is just to let you know that your recent edits to this article introduced some problems. First, the RCAF did not exist between 1 February 1968 and 15 August 2011 so to call it that in between those dates is inaccurate. It is also inaccurate to refer to people who only served in the CF and not the RCAF as "retired RCAF Colonel..." etc. Second, you changed a few of the dates in the article from the WikiProject Aircraft consensus standard of ddmmyy to mmddyy format, making the dates in the article inconsistent as well as against consensus. You also introduced changes to direct quotes and spelling errors. I have fixed all these problems. Please discuss if you have questions. - Ahunt (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |