Plantforestsoil

Welcome!

Hello, Plantforestsoil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Envy Theory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Timneu22 · talk 14:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Envy Theory

I have nominated Envy Theory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy Theory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 14:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

FWIW, I think you'll have a hard time establishing notability of this, but what you need is to be able to show that this work has had a significant impact already in academics. You should also take a look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, as that seems to apply. Don't take it hard if the article gets deleted, it's very unusual for a new editor to successfully field an article on their first attempts. Keeping them in userspace is a good idea, then you can ask for feedback. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your interest. The envy concept has already had a notable impact all over South America and Europe. My contribution is to help it gain further credibility in North America, esp. by subjecting it to further scientifc research as both a theory and a therapy. It will make a significant contribution to child mental health and helping adults gain greater personal and relationship insight. (User talk: Plantforestsoil 16 June 2010

Your edit to Envy

Hi Plantforestsoil. I just removed your edit to Envy, for two reasons. First, it did not add to any encyclopedic knowledge of envy. It just said that Ninivaggi has constructed a novel theory. Second, even if you would have written a few words about what the novel theory is about, it would probably be original research, which is against this wikipedia policy. Lova Falk talk 12:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

More Ninivaggi promotion

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ageing, you may be blocked from editing. --CliffC (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Please also take a look at Wikipedia:COIN#Ageing_-_author_promoting_own_works. Please do not continue to add references to your own work to Wikipedia, it is considered to be spamming. I have removed the references you added with this account and Butterplantforest (talk · contribs) SmartSE (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to People skills. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - You seem to have had warnings on apparently promotional edits in the past. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

You also need to read Wikipedia's definition of a minor edit. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)