Planespotter 748

Welcome!

Hello, Planespotter 748, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jeanne calments longevity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeanne calments longevity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeanne calments longevity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Stratford

Hello Planespotter 748,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charles Stratford for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Notability

Hi, your are upset or unhappy because an article you started on a WW1 soldier has been speedy deleted. There were millions of soldiers in this war (and the second one), for whom military records can be found, plus short mentions in the media when they got severely wounded or killed. That doesn't make them notable in the Wikipedia sense. They need to have been the subject of non-routine coverage from reliable, independent sources (nor primary sources like military records or family papers), which they usually get by doing (or being) something out-of-the-ordinary, like getting a major award, playing a truly important role in the war (by commanding part of an army or leading a special operation), or otherwise being noted (in depth) over a prolonged period of time. I don't see such coverage for the deleted article, and it is unliekly that he (nor most other WW1 soldiers) have received such coverage. In such a case, Wikipedia (which while having loads of pages still is an encyclopedia) is not the place to host this information. Fram (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Advice on notability

Hello, Do not get discouraged. To make your edits more productive in the future I recommend that you read this guide: Wikipedia:Your first article. It will help you decide first if the subject is notable. Notability is a requirement for inclusion. The basic criteria is having received significant coverage from independent reliable sources. You can find out more here WP:N and here:WP:GNG.

Once you have a topic that meets the criteria and you have sources you can follow this wizard to help you create the article in a way it won't be speedy deleted: Wikipedia:Article_wizard

Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Granny Game moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Granny Game, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Granny Game

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Granny Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://granny.wikia.com/wiki/Granny_(game). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Granny ( Game )

Hello, Planespotter 748,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Granny ( Game ) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granny ( Game ) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Granny ( Game ), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Granny (game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Granny (game), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Linda Wiggins

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Planespotter 748, thanks for creating Linda Wiggins!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Supercentenarian articles

I suggest you read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Longevity#Biographies before creating any more of these biographies. Wikipedia:WikiProject Longevity is an attempt to bring the large volume of supercentenarian related articles into line with general Wikipedia policies with regard to notability. As such many biographies have been deleted as failing to meet the necessary criteria. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 20:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Maudie Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maudie Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maudie Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 00:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Using the correct analysis time

Your updates to the current infobox are much appreciated, but please use the correct analysis ("as of") time. The JMA says "Analysis as of..." below the issuance time; please use that rather than the issuance time (i.e. 6:00 and not 6:40), since it takes a nonzero amount of time to analyze the system and forecast it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

2018–19 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season#Seasonal effects

You broke the template without fixing it and even provided incorrect information. Please make sure if you have the abilities to edit correctly, or I have to report your edits as vandalism next time. 🐱💬 09:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Meow: Again, you need to read WP:NOTVAND, because good faith edits are almost by definition not vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Granny (game)

Hello, Planespotter 748. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Granny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)