Pixel-Lead453

April 2024

Hello, I'm Panian513. I noticed that you recently removed content from John G. Stackhouse Jr. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Panian513 20:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

You seem to be attempting to whitewash John G. Stackhouse Jr.. For content issues like this, it is best for you to discuss your complaints on the article's talk page. It is important for your sake to lay out your argument why you disagree with particular content in the article or the sources cited. You are going to be blocked for edit warring and we will likely find out that you are a sockpuppet. When you inevitably return under another account, any points you can explain on the talk page will do more than your nonsense edit warring. It is easy for admins to increase protection on the article so that you'll never be able to edit it, even with a new Wikipedia account. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ancel Keys, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. If you continue to send threats and harassment, you may be removed from Wikipedia. Pixel-Lead453 (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pixel-Lead453 reported by User:Russ Woodroofe (Result: ). Thank you. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)