Piscili
Piscili, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
Hi Piscili! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Marco Canolintas for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Canolintas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TAXIDICAEđ° 17:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Marco Canolinntas for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Canolinntas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Regarding my edits to William Crain (filmmaker) edit
Can you check my edits more closely? I removed the link to the site of unrelated filmmaker Rob Crain and tagged the article as needing any verifiable sources; I then decided to return and add three sources to verify the biography of a living person. 73.37.211.177 (talk) 06:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Someone else reinstated my edits. This is the third time I've been erroneously warned in the past two months: in both cases, a human checked Recent Changes with RedWarn or SWViewer and trusted the tool understood good from bad. You have to be careful with semi-automated or automated tools, they can mislead you into thinking they replace human evaluationâbut they just flag edits for review based on simple criteria. 73.37.211.177 (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Your revert to WHS edit
Hi, I noticed you reverted an IP user's edit to Westfield High School (New Jersey). The IP edit seemed constructive as it seemed to fix a grammatical error. I wanted to let you know that I restored the IP editor's version, but if you believe this was incorrect, I'd like to hear from you. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, the IP removed content from the page without explaining why in their first edit and in the second edit introduced new content that has grammatical errors. I think that the edit that seemed right is the last edit which also tried to correct some of the errors in the second edit. Please, review the edits. Thanks. Piscili (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- The edit which you reverted was the edit which fixed the grammatical error. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 13:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- please check this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westfield_High_School_(New_Jersey)&diff=prev&oldid=1220542817 Piscili (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- The revision you made was unrelated to this. This was the edit you made. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- please check this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westfield_High_School_(New_Jersey)&diff=prev&oldid=1220542817 Piscili (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- The edit which you reverted was the edit which fixed the grammatical error. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 13:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)