NM Rothschild

edit

Hey, as you know we've both made several edits to the article about NM Rothschild. I'm concerned we're adding too many people to the list of current and former employees. In order to ensure that we only add truly notable people to the list, I suggest that we only include people about whom there exists a Wikipedia article. We could keep track of those who don't have Wikipedia articles on the talk page. With so many notable current and former employees, there's really no need to list those at the margin of notability. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this. Agentstop2 (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sydney Gruson, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02E3DD1530F93AA35750C0A96E958260, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sydney Gruson and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sydney Gruson with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sydney Gruson.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Sydney Gruson/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Sydney Gruson saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! KrakatoaKatie 23:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Pierce&Pierce! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 688 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Graham Hearne - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of René-Pierre Azria

edit
 

The article René-Pierre Azria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged for over 2 years on Notability and for some months on its lack of references but remains unreferenced and without evidence that the subject meets the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sock-puppet

edit

Sock-puppet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.174.102 (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply