User talk:Pichemist/Archive 25
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
Questions relating to Draft: Sustainable Healthcare
Hello Pichemist, I was aware that my article Draft: Sustainable Healthcare was likely to be rejected based on the advice given by Kvng on the 29th of November (I'm not sure if you can see this but it's on my talk page I think). This editor had advised me to cut it down by a half to a third of its current size which I plan to do soon. Do you have any advice on any areas that I could improve or cut out to make it more likely to be accepted? Any thoughts would be appreciated. I also noted on the talk page it says I have been paid by the Centre for Sustainable healthcare - I'm actually a volunteer - do you know if there is a way to change it to volunteer? Thank you for taking the time to look at the article anyway. Glasgow87 (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- I should have fixed the template on the draft's talk page, regarding the article I'd recommend finding references to backup all the claims. See WP:COI. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 07:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Mikiel Spiteri moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mikiel Spiteri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 07:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mercuryo
Hello Pichemist,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mercuryo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 08:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)