PhysicsCali

January 2018 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'm Adotchar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Helen Quinn— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. _{Adotchar| reply here} 01:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Burbidge Award (January 20) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mortee was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NOTABILITY. The facts here look straightforward so I'd have no objection personally to the article being included, but there aren't any secondary references (ones from places other than the APS itself) yet to show that it's notable. Please do resubmit when you've added some.

One minor query - the text begins "... was an award". It was awarded in 2016 at least.[1] Was it discontinued at that point?

Also, your username is PhysicsCali. If you have a connection to the award you ought to declare a WP:COI, and either way read the username guidelines and particularly WP:ISU. Accounts on Wikipedia are supposed to be operated by individuals, not groups. It could just be named for your personal interest, of course, but it might be advantageous to pick a new username just to make it clear that you're one person. I hope this helps.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mortee (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Burbidge Award (March 7) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With all of the references coming either from the organisation that gives the awards or from people or institutions associated with the recipients, I don't see how our general guidelines for notability have been met. I also looked into the question of whether there might be some specialised basis for accepting this article, as well as the possibility that the awards (and winners) might find a home in some other article. But neither seems possible, given the following facts.

First, this award is not given by the American Physical Society -- it's given by a chapter of that Society that covers only a few U.S. states. And second, this award is not given to practising physicists -- it's a $250 award given to graduate students.

In all, I don't see any reasonable chance that this draft, if accepted, would survive a deletion nomination.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, PhysicsCali! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Burbidge Award (May 21) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

I concur with the detailed anaysis provided that this is not a notable award. The granting organization is not even notable as it is only a chapter per WP.BRANCH. Do not resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Margaret Burbidge Award, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic