Philosophenweg
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Robertjkoenig (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Image Tagging for Image:Dawn_1.gif
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Dawn_1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. Can I just ask you to edit this article with a little more delicacy? The edits you've been making are clearly designed to reduce the article to a level of uselessness, and that's really not fair on those editors who, rightly or wrongly, have put effort into the article. Perhaps try editing somewhere else instead? Also note the three-revert-rule. This says that, if you revert an article more than 3 times in 24 hours, you may be blocked from editing: this coupled with the clearly poor standard of your edits is likely to result in you being unable to edit if you continue in your current fashion. Thanks. -Splashtalk 19:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, Splash's suggestions are right on here. Also, please don't create duplicate articles with alternative titles. If you want to associate United Services Automobile Assoc with USAA, the proper way to do it is with a redirect. Most of all, though, please don't use Wikipedia as a space to exercise your apparent grievance against USAA. Replacing our articles with out-of-context material copied from other sources is just not acceptable here. FreplySpang (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Please leave the archives of the talk page alone. They are not for reposting your preferred (and unacceptable) version of the article or for playing around with issues that have already gone quiet. I'm going to be clear now: if you continue to edit in this manner to this article (or indeed any other) I am going to block you. You appear to have several other accounts; I will block those as and when you use them. -Splashtalk 16:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
editAs you have just decided to fork the article onto my userpage where there is no question of its bad-faith misplacement, I have blocked you. If (and only if) you wish to edit appropriately, you are welcome to return when your block expires. -Splashtalk 16:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)