User page vandalism

edit

If you list your user page and user talk page here then an automated bot will automatically revert anything it thinks is vandalism. --Hut 8.5 15:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have semi-protected this page for a while to prevent further harassment of this user by IPs. If you would like this undone, let me know. New users won't be able to post here until the semi-protection expires. Jehochman Talk 16:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi Peter, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/GeorgeFormby1 has been investigated and closed, user:GeorgeFormby1 was using one of those IPs and is to be indefinitely blocked and his IP address blocked for a month. Hopefully this is the end of the matter. ϢereSpielChequers 06:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Forget about the vandals!

edit

Just something to cheer you up after this vandal attacks!

History cleaned

edit

I have cleaned the history of your User and Talk page, per your concern at AN/I. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 15:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Stevie Vann

edit

Since Talk:Stevie Vann was deleted, I've copied your comment there to User talk:Philosopher#Contacting you re: your deletion of "Stevie Vann" page. We can discuss it there. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

...and it's   Done. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: My objection to you deleting "Talk: Stevie Vann" page

edit

Re your message: I deleted the talk page per G8 because your post did not lead to the deletion of the article as the exemption is intended to cover. Instead, you were asking why it was deleted. The original article was deleted as a proposed deletion. The talk page was deleted as an orphaned talk page.

Since your goal appears to be to get the article restored/rewritten: if you want the original article restored, since it was a proposed deletion, you can ask for it to be restored by the deleting admin or through requests for undeletion. Or you can just recreate it. A proposed deletion does not prevent anybody from recreating the article or requesting its undeletion. All you have to do is ask. If you have a complaint about my administrative actions, you are welcome to bring them up at Administrator's Noticeboard. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Growth factor receptor inhibitor was accepted

edit
 
Growth factor receptor inhibitor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2017

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist, from its old location at User:Peter Dow/Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 13:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist, from its old location at User:Peter Dow/Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 14:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist has been accepted

edit
 
Beta-2 adrenergic antagonist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist has been accepted

edit
 
Beta-3 adrenergic antagonist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply