Perunova straža

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! WhiteWriter ^speaks 14:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

2011 Kosovo–Serbia border clashes

Hello! Just one thing. Here on English wikipedia, we have several articles that deals with Kosovo situation.

• Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija - For province as part of Serbia.
• Republic of Kosovo - For de facto independant state
• Kosovo - region, and entity claimed by those two.

Following that, 2011 Kosovo–Serbia border clashes deal with problems between first two, so we used Republic of Kosovo, instead of Kosovo, when we talk about politics. In geography, history, etc, we use only Kosovo. So i had to revert your edit, as that is internationally neutral. If you have any question, talk to me, and i will help you. Može i na Srpskom, ako je tako lakše. :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 14:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

In geography, history (especially history), etc. Kosovo and Metohija ought to be used, since that is after all name of the region that consists of two parts: Kosovo and Metohija. Abbreviation Kosmet can also be used.

Second, the Al-Jazzera article doesn't mention any deployment of troops by Republic of Serbia, so the comment is not verified by the given reference and was removed. If you aim for internationally neutral point of view then the bar is set by UN Resolution 1244. However Wikipedia in English perhaps seeks the point of view of anglophone countries. If that is the case then the fact should be clearly stated in terms other than internationally neutral. I've changed border posts into check points, since former implies yet unresolved status of [Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija]] and later being in tune with UN Resolution 1244. Other changes are also along international neutrality of the article. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to continue this talk and I would be more than glad to help you in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. Perunova straža (talk) 16:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Bravo! Well, what do you propose, in the first place? Regarding point of view of anglophone countries, it was agreed that area of Kosovo and Metohija is usually called in that same countries as only Kosovo, as per Wikipedia:Common name. I also dont like "border" term, but i cannot find something that would be best, for all sides... So, what will we do next, in order to fix it? :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The term administrative line is in use by international community, UN, EU, and other relevant institutions. If aim is neutrality of the article that term should be used, and not language of daily press (this also covers the term of Kosovo and Metohija, since in Encyclopedia Britannica, number of references on Metohija exist, and that term maintains the neutrality of the article). Perunova straža (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

If you see specific issues, please let me know at my talk page and I'll be glad to try to help you sort them out! :)

Theopolisme _TALK 10:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Late Antiquity and Medieval sites in Kosovo edits

Dear User:Perunova_straža, could you give explanation to the following edits that you have done in the Late Antiquity and Medieval Sites in Kosovo page:

• How is This Period Part of Archaeology of Serbia?
• How is this part of the same category of Archaeology of Serbia?
• Why is Vrella written as Vrela - proof of a document with that name required!
• Why is Pogragja written as Podgrade - proof of a document where it is written as such required!
• Why is Morava e Binces written as Binacka Morava - proof of a document where it is written as such required!
• Why is Harilaq Fortress written as Ariljaca - proof of a document where it is written as such required!

I have provided a document that proves that those names are the official names published by the Ministry of Culture of Kosovo, for public education and information. What proof could you provide that shows me and the community that those edits are objective and knowledge-based, and aren't POV, or Vandalism.--Atdheu (talk) 02:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for replying in [[talk|my talk page]] about the edits that you made to the Late Antiquity and Medieval Sites in Kosovo, User:Perunova_straža. Unfortunately I do not think that your arguments stand in an academic stance. This was your reply to my question:

• How is This Period Part of Archaeology of Serbia?

Because the article is describing Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo and Metohija.

• Why is Vrella written as Vrela - proof of a document with that name required!
• Why is Pogragja written as Podgrade - proof of a document where it is written as such required!
• Why is Morava e Binces written as Binacka Morava - proof of a document where it is written as such required!
• Why is Harilaq Fortress written as Ariljaca - proof of a document where it is written as such required!

These are the names of the said places. You are just transliterating them in Albanian. You've provided a brochure containing state propaganda. That is not the way Wikipedia is edited. Now, stop vandalizing the article, please. Perunova straža (talk) 07:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

The one answer that you gave me was a WP:POV. Could you explain how this article describes Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo and what proof do you have of making such a statement. Also I would like to beg you not to do mindless edits to an article that was compiled using proper academic data, based on your POV because it is starting to resemble vandalism. Also your statement that the article is state propaganda doesn't stand, being that there was proper academic research done and is still being done upon these archaeological localities. If you continue with the same trend of behavior, which seems destructive and baseless I will be forced to report you to the admins, which will then have to deal with you and your problems. If you have proper arguments that can prove your claims, then please come forward and be our guest, but do not make nationalistic edits which do not give anything to education, culture and knowledge, which is what is being tried to be taught by these articles. Regards, --Atdheu (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello! I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles. We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania. I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!. Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Replacing Kosovo with Serbia throughout wikipedia is disruptive and admin intervention will be asked, so please stick to the norms. Either Kosovo is added or if necessary Kosovo with the template but never Serbia as you did. Kosovo is de facto independent and de jure half of the world recognizes it as such, so you can't add "Serbia", thus we add either "Kosovo" that links to the geographical article or "Kosovo" with the template note.— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 18:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stick to the decorum, editing norms and certainly don't copy/paste this note on my talkpage. That being said, you can report anyone you want, although arguments like the one you left on my talkpage combined with mass accusations of "state propaganda" and "vandalism" against others may backfire. Also, the fact that you created one-line stubs as a response to your dispute with Atdheu with no encyclopedic intentions is itself quite disruptive.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 18:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing in the said article. This is a second warning! You have changed the names of this article's archaeological sites from the official name used and published in English by the Archaeological Institute of Kosovo[1], into Serbian three times already. These are protected archaeological sites, and are called by the names as written, not as is your point of view. You have violated the neutral point of view policy three times. Also you have violated the WP:NPA, by turning the argument against me, instead of focusing to give proof of your edits. Proof has never come, and the only ones that you provided by creating 2 stub articles, reference data published in the time of ex-Yugoslavia. Such country exists no more. Please provide neutral updated data, and no nationalistic banter. It only adds fuel to the fire.--Atdheu (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Perunova straža. You have new messages at Atdheu's talk page.
Message added 12:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Binačka Morava

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Binačka Morava, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.oursportscentral.com/services/history/wiki.php?title=South_Morava.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Fort

Nominate Novo Brdo Fortress‎ for DYK, it can be done now! Just add few more inline citations. --WhiteWriter^speaks 23:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

• I made some comments on the DYK for Novo Brdo Fortress‎. - tucoxn\^talk 03:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Did you know

Hi! Please consider adding new, sourced articles (within 5 days of creation or 5x expansion) to the Wikipedia:Did you know, in order to enlight the community about your articles! If you have any questions, please ask me or Antidiskriminator. Thank you.--Zoupan 15:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Good luck with DYK nomination. I am glad you know to swim away.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		I have noticed your edits and appreciated them greatly. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Sources

Copy/pasting part of the previous version and readding it along with deliberate inaccuracies is disruptive (Along with the majority of Serbian Eastern Orthodox population, local Serb and (from the second half of 15th century)). In fact, it indicates that you haven't read the sources as the records are from 1405. That being said, Before the Ottoman conquest Novo Brdo was a Catholic stronghold; from the late 15th century on it was included in the Orthodox ecclesiastical organisation of the Ohrid Archbishopric i.e. please stick to the sources. Needless to say that I will ask for admin intervention if this is repeated i.e. no sources = no edits.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 11:38, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

And if you can't follow sources, get off this site and find yourself a forum to promote your pro-Serb propaganda. Neutral Fair Guy (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Novo Brdo Fortress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sophia, Rampart and Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Novo Brdo Fortress

Hello! Your submission of Novo Brdo Fortress at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Cookies!

	Here's a plate full of cookies to share!
	Hi Perunova straža, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! WhiteWriterspeaks 14:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi

You took part in Vučitrn → Vushtrri RM. Please see suggestion for follow up at MOSKOS RfC?. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your article Zatrić

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Zatrić to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Pomoć

Imao sam poteškoća sa administratorima Wikipedije koji su mi odbili moj draft za srpskog odbojkaša koji igra za reprezentaciju, zbog "nepouzdanih" izvora. Jedini način da dokažem da su pouzdani je da dovedem čoveka koji govori srpski i koje može reći da su izvori pouzdani. Tako da te molim da mi pomogneš tako što bi proverio članke tj izvore koje sam stavio i da evaluiraš da li su dovoljno dobri za Wikipediju što jesu ali engleska Wikipedija traži potvrdu trećeg člana. Ako misliš da jesu samo napiši u odgovoru.

Hvala na vremenu.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Miran_Kujund%C5%BEi%C4%87 Narmerae (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)