Perricline

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IQMS. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  02:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

You have new messages

Hello, Perricline. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

 Chzz  ►  19:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IQMS was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happysailor ^(Talk) 10:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again for reviewing so promptly. You mention the article is to "spammy" can you give me a specific example? As I mentioned I was following structure and content type of a similar article ( Plex Systems) Also what reference do you you feel are questionable. All are industry specific publications and blogs. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Perricline (talk) 15:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Perricline. Firstly, thankyou for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Secondly, while I did decline the article - it was declined as the hold issues had not been resolved after a 24hour waiting period. User:I-20 is actually the reviewer who's comments you mentioned above, and it might be best to get his opinion (i have left a {{Talkback}} on his page for you. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 16:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah now I get it. I'm very new to this. And did not see his comment I-20 left me after I had asked for specifics before I made my improvements. As you can see by my comment, I thought it I was communicating with I-20 and not you with the second comment. I was waiting for the suggestions to make the change. Since I-20 had to manually review the timeing might have been off and not logged. Is it possible to get this back into pending and I will make the necessary changes? Thank you for understanding.

Perricline (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

You are free to edit and improve the article in it's current state, then when it is ready for review in your opinion, just add {{AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the page. If we kept pages on hold indefinately, we would have a huge backlog in the system. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 19:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IQMS was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  01:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I've replied, see User talk:Chzz#Verifiable sources vs. produced by creator in IQMS article.  Chzz  ►  19:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply is now archived in User talk:Chzz/Archive 26#Verifiable sources vs. produced by creator in IQMS article.

Please don't edit the archive page though; to ask me anything else, start a new section on User talk:Chzz. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  04:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

IQMS

IQMS, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)