Perfect Mask

Welcome!

Hello, Perfect Mask, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Sexism does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:37, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

On the contrary, I tried to make this article a little bit neutral. Sexual objectivation is a very controversial concept. But in the article it talks as if it were a fact. It must be editing. Perfect Mask (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Please note the discretionary sanctions when you edit material concerning gender-related disputes

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  Bishonen | talk 20:10, 20 June 2019 (UTC).

• I've given you this alert specifically because of the interest you have shown in feminism. (It's nothing to do with GamerGate.) Bishonen | talk 20:10, 20 June 2019 (UTC).

Biggest part of the articles about feminism are breake the rule about neutral point of view. For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminazi. First of all, this term are widely used by people. And the meaning is widely known. Some people can use it for all feminists, but biggest part using it just for radicals. For example the dictionary of popular slang defined the term exactly. Secondly, all article isn`t neutral. It represent the position of feminist movement. I tried to clarify this point. I wrote that they "...would prefer a total ban for all visual forms of women's sexuality" (which is same as ultraconservative moral advocated by far-right), for axample. But all edits are being undone. Perfect Mask (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)