Peon ruler

Sorry about the revert

Sorry about the accidental revert on your edit to Women's Twenty20 cricket. I had a misclick and was trying to revert a different edit. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

No worries! Thanks for the note. -- Peon ruler

Peon ruler, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Peon ruler! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Resumption of promotional editing from a blocked editor.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

As further explanation:

1. You are the obvious sockpuppet of another editor, who was indefinitely blocked for adding advertising material with a promotional username--using an open proxy in both instances.* , It has returned without explaining the connection, and have continued to add material which was essentially advertising; this account too has been blocked.

2.The material was added to mainspace despite the conflict of interest, with edits designed to evade or rules requiring use of draft pace for new articles by new editors.

3.The material consisted of long sections of advocacy explaining the underlying problems, a long overpersonal account of how the two inventors devised the scheme and their own individual merits, & direct advertising claims about the security and other benefits. This is appropriate for the firm's web page, not an encyclopedia

4.It was sourced almost entirely to he firms own website, PR sites, mere listings, t mere announcements of funding, and similar. (Tho some are in Chinese, the online translations make it obvious that everything is copied from their own press releases.)

You are, however, quite correct in your statement on my user talk page that we proceed to remove material of this nature as rapidly as we possibly can.

DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

• confirmed by my running checkuser. DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)