👍 Like your edit at 2012 Benghazi attack. You replaced a biased unsupported statement with on-topic supported assertions. Well played! ClaudeReigns (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I see you readded the references. Just doublechecked the first one to be sure, and of course, it matched. I think a helpful thing to do after the revert is to just say a little something about what you'd like to see from the article on the talk page to help get some conversation going. Edit wars are bad for getting new editors to help, and I think you would agree that the more we work like a team and are nice to each other, the more likely it is that we can build participation to keep each other honest and motivated to do good work. Just my two cents. Glad to have you around. ClaudeReigns (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk:2012 Benghazi attack edit

The present lead was drafted through consensus on the talk page, and we are currently involved in a discussion on the talk page about changes to it. Please discuss any changes you'd like to make there, as this is a controversial subject. No one individual editor can really represent consensus in this case. I've reverted your changes in the interim, as I had just reverted previous changes. RGloucester (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your attempts to deal with POV issues. Your most recent edit resolved my concerns. Thanks. RGloucester (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William G. Boykin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Hawk Down (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what happened on Benghazi article edit

Looks like your recent edit fix was reverted? I'm confused. Please visit again to see what's what. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 23:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits on Benghazi article edit

Not sure of intended meaning on your recent edits so I started a discussion on Talk page. Appreciate your feedback. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 20:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, PeaceLoveHarmony. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, PeaceLoveHarmony. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply