Your submission at Articles for creation: X lymphocyte (January 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, PavlinaJancova! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lymphocyte. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Over-interpretation, synthesis, and poor English grammar. Practice more in your sandbox and get help with writing at WP:TEA. Zefr (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

On my talk page, you said: "Hello, I am trying to understand the problem with the content I added to the article Lymphocyte. I believe my English isn’t perfect, because it isn’t my mother-tongue. But can you explain to me please, in which part of the article did I add original research or novel synthesis? I cited the primary source because it is a new thing and any review doesn’t exist. I added two articles from science websites because most people wouldn’t understand the primary article. That’s not a reliable source? Or is it the main problem that it’s a new thing? Not confirmed yet? Described by only one group so far? But I wrote that it’s just a theory. Would it be acceptable if I left the part about the authors' thoughts of the future, rewrite it and improve my grammar? I wrote it because I think it’s an interesting discovery and the article can be rewritten when more information will be available. Thank you for your advice."
This edit 1) used early-stage lab research, 2) speculated about "functional" receptor roles in the cell, 3) suggested a potential unproven role in type I diabetes, and 4) speculated about future uses of an undefined mechanism. On Wikipedia, this is called WP:SYNTH, as it represents your opinion and original research. Medical content for the encyclopedia requires high-quality reviews, as described in WP:MEDREV and the rest of the MEDRS guideline.
Here are two tutorials for you to review:
Wikiproject Medicine video guide for new medical editors
and Wikiproject Medicine tutorial for new medical editors. You can also read WP:WHYMEDRS and WP:MEDHOW.
Your apparent inexperience with writing English was evident. Why would you be editing the English encyclopedia medical content - which has a very high standard - rather than in your own language? Such an edit as you provided requires other medical editors to fact-check your sources, and invest time to correct the many grammatical errors. You can respond here if you wish further discussion. Good luck. --Zefr (talk) 18:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I thought it isn't my opinion because the authors of the cited article suggested the role in type I diabetes and the other mentioned things. But as I understand now after our discussion, it's not correct to write on wikipedia about topics that haven't been proven yet. And to answer your question - I didn't choose to edit English wikipedia on my own, we have to improve one article on English wikipedia per semester to pass one of our master subjects at university (advances in immunology). I will find another topic to improve. PavlinaJancova (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

You should ask for help with your editing in English at the Teahouse, WP:TEA. --Zefr (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:X lymphocyte

edit
 

Hello, PavlinaJancova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "X lymphocyte".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply