Please see and respond to the message left for you at User talk:Paul David Wilson#User page. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 06:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The best thing would be for you to go to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and ask them about the sources. Another good place to look would be Wikipedia:Notability (music) and see if you meet the guidelines laid out there. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think the best thing would be to go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music and ask there for input on it. There is Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians but that does not seem very active and I think the first would get you more help. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Categories in Paul David Wilson

edit

The following categories are inappropriate for an article about a person Category:Advertising, that category is for advertising in general, the article may be appropriate for categorization in Category:Advertising people, but even that I think is a stretch. Category:Songwriters should be American songwriters. Category:Song forms is for song forms, not for people. Category:Jingles is for jingles, not people. PDW is a person, not a jingle, also Category:Jingle writers is in Jingles so it is redundant. Category:Jingle companies same thing, he is a person not a company. Please do not add removed categories that are not appropriate, it does not improve the article at all. Also please make sure that you have read WP:COI for writing about articles that you may have a conflict of interest with. Thank you. --kelapstick (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion

edit

Hi Paul, first let me thank you for your contributions to the Wikipedia project - they are greatly appreciated. I noticed that you are contributing to a variety of articles and talk pages, and I'm glad to see that. One thing I did want to mention was in regards to the Paul David Wilson article. Several editors have expressed a concern about a conflict of interest in regards to your edits there. While I don't see a problem with notability, it's generally not a good idea to work on your own article. There are plenty of Wikipedians who have their own articles (see: Article on Wikipedians), they generally don't edit their own articles. The main thing you may want to read over would be: Wikipedia:Autobiography. Normally, your best approach would be to let others do the editing, and for you to add comments, clarifications, and such to the talk page at: Talk:Paul David Wilson. Please don't think I'm "telling you what to do", rather I'm suggesting what is a standard practice here. Again, thank you for joining our family - and I look forward to working with you in the future. Cheers, and happy editing. — Ched :  ?  01:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Pauldavidwilson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Ched :  ?  01:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bowen High School

edit

Hello. When you're writing an article, please be sure to use your own words as much as possible. I recently removed a big chunk from Bowen High School because the material was copied directly from other sources. (Much of the information was also very out-of-date.)

You're free to re-expand the article, as long as you remember to paraphrase. Zagalejo^^^ 20:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

To clarify, I meant that some of the information is poorly paraphrased. There are still lots of whole phrases lifted from the sources. (For example: "In March 2002, Bowen submitted a request to convert to small school in response to a CPS Small School Request for Proposals..." "In 2002 under the auspices of the Chicago High School Redesign Initiative...") You should write in your own words as much as possible to avoid plagiarism and possible copyright problems.
You can restore the facts eventually, but only if the prose is entirely in your own words (as much as possible, anyway). You can work on a draft in your userspace: User:Pauldavidwilson/Sandbox. If you want, I can copyedit it for you when you're done. Just let me know.
I do think Wikipedia would benefit from a good article on Bowen, so I'm willing to help you out. However, I don't think this version of the page is ready to go live. Let's take our time, and try to make it the best article we can. Zagalejo^^^ 02:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't mean to be a spoilsport, but I don't want you to get in trouble for plagiarism or copyright violations. We have to be careful about those things.
As I said, I do think Bowen is a worthwhile topic. If I have time soon, I'll see if I can reword some of the content you added. Zagalejo^^^ 14:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bowen Boilermakers.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bowen Boilermakers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Paul David Wilson,

The Board of the Bowen High School Alumni Association, Inc. has reported seeing on the Wikipedia web site Bowen’s Boilermaker Mascot. This mascot was obtained and entered into Wikipedia without determining licensing issues.

Could you please advise your source or authority in obtaining this Mascot. Please feel free to call me at 847-433-4567

Thank You,

Bob Robert J. Kuhel Board Treasurer/Officer Bowen High School Alumni Association, Inc. 76.209.53.85 (talk) 23:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bowen Boilermakers.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Bowen Boilermakers.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul David Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shasta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Pauldavidwilson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply