Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi PaulPachad! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:24, Sunday, May 22, 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eliyahu Simpson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I had too many windows open and reverted your edit instead of another on another article. Very sorry!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Tommi1986. Hi Tommi, thank you I was the user who added the delete prod, but after further research I see I was in error. Thank you for reaching out! PaulPachad (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries, I always admit when I make a mistake!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Tommi, its really nice to meet you. I see that you are a really experienced editor. I created my first page today. Would you be able to look it over to give me some feedback? If you can I would be grateful. If you are busy no worries at all. @Tommi1986 PaulPachad (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@PaulPachad:I would do, however my experience is in anti-vandalism so my knowledge on article creation is limited. I assume this is for the article Eve Barlow? It would appear that it has been marked with a Notability tag. My advice would be to request this to be moved to draft space and work on it, you can then submit it for review where someone with knowledge in this area will be able to advise what you need to do to improve it ready for main space. Alternatively pop by the WP:teahouse and ask for assistance. Please don't feel bad if your article is removed due to issues, the hardest thing to do on Wikipedia is to create new articles (which is why I never have) but look here as well Your First Article for some tips on creating. Sorry I couldn't be much more help to you, but if you ever need help, reach out to me on my talk page and I will do my best!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Tommi1986 thank you Tommi, you are really so kind. I appreciate you. I hope to be in touch. PaulPachad (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Tommi, i just submitted this article, do you think its ready for me to move it to the articlespace?
Draft:Marjorie Stewart (1912–1988) PaulPachad (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, PaulPachad

Thank you for creating Penney S. Azcarate.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@North8000: Thank you North for your very kind words. It really means a lot. I look forward to adding more as I learn more. I am always open to feedback on how to improve, and I know that I can learn alot from experienced editors like you. PaulPachad (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi North, I just created this article, do you think its ready for me to move it to the mainspace? Draft:Marjorie Stewart (1912–1988) PaulPachad (talk) 01:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jessica Abo for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Abo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Abo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 20:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi PaulPachad! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a permitted way to ask other wikipedia editors to weigh in on AfD debates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removing "dead links"

edit

Hello! Per WP:REDYES, red links (or "dead links") are encouraged when a subject does not have an article but could have one. In the case of Sean Suiter, Jenkins is definitely notable and I plan to write an article on him someday. Thanks, Queen of Heartstalk 00:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok, my apologies! PaulPachad (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see you've now written an article on Jenkins – good work! I'm still surprised we don't have an article on the GTTF itself; I started a draft for it but (stupidly) never saved it onwiki and it's on my computer, which is in the shop. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 00:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marjorie Stewart (actor) has been accepted

edit
 
Marjorie Stewart (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknow? (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Fosslien (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, PaulPachad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wayne Jenkins (police officer) (August 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Liz Fosslien moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Liz Fosslien. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Liz Fosslien has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Liz Fosslien. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your kind assistance, my friend. I will add sources that are independent PaulPachad (talk) 10:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi PaulPachad. Thank you for your work on Wayne Jenkins (police officer). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariah Riddlesprigger has been accepted

edit
 
Mariah Riddlesprigger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNanotalk 16:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Chen (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lauren Chen for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Chen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Chen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know. I will try my best to defend this. I wish you an amazing weekend! PaulPachad (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Chen

edit

Please revert your close of this AfD. It is extremely inappropriate to close an AfD for an article that you have created. -- asilvering (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

done, my sincere apologies PaulPachad (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Are you able to handle the formalities? PaulPachad (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing to be handled at this point, since you've reverted all the relevant edits (thank you!). The discussion should not have been closed this early. -- asilvering (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok understood. I saw that it was closed by another editor, so i assumed they forgot to remove the templates, and did that
My sincere apologies! How many days is typical to close? PaulPachad (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Seven days, after which they can be relisted up to three more times if the consensus isn't clear. -- asilvering (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your generous help! I appreciate you. PaulPachad (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek Day (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Star Trek Day has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Star Trek Day. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek Day has been accepted

edit
 
Star Trek Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for your very gracious and kind help PaulPachad (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
its a good article, I myself didn't know there was a day ...live long and prosper--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, you are so kind! PaulPachad (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malia Obama (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malia Obama (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

REFPUNCT

edit

I took a look atyour drafts, and something you should know is that references should be right after punctuation, not right before, as you have done. Cheers, Aaron Liu (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, good to know! PaulPachad (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply