Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Patrick Neylan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WT:DYK edit

Thanks for your comments. The above link is the specific place for discussing DYK philosophy. thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Avars edit

I don`t have any particular interest in the issue. I just wanted, simply, to make the article better. I saw your last edit, and I agree with most of it, although there are two issue I want to comment upon:

  1. However, evidence is mounting in favour of the theory that the Avars who settled in Transylvania (called pseudo-avars by early geographers)... - This is wrong. The Avars didn`t settled Transylvania. They settled the Pannonian plain. Transylvania was an inaccesible place, sorrounded by mountains and thick forests, inhospitable for the Avar way of life. They most probably did control it from the military pov, but they didn`t settled it. This confusion probable came from the theory that the Szekelys are the descendants of the Avars. Irrespective of the validity of that theory, the Szekely settled Transylvania in the 13th century, being colonised by king Andrew of Hungary.
  2. The skeletons found in European Avar graves are of a common type, inculding Mongoloid features,... - I think the phrasing skeletons found in European Avar graves show heterogenity is better. Common type is common only to a specific place. A common type in Europe, is naturaly not the same to the common type found in Asia for example. Regarding this subject, you could check out this article.

I forgot to say that I agree to the way you want to structure the article. Go ahead! :D Cheers!

Iconoclasm edit

You'll have to do a bit better than that to explain the problem! As it is, it's worse than no explanation - though it will doubtless provoke someone else or me to improve it. Johnbod 02:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Manzikert edit

The image description says that it shows the dates when the Turks took the cities in Asia Minor and the little red thing is a flame, like a fire resulting from conquest and destruction, just to emphasize the conquest. Click on the image to see it more clearly. Tourskin (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:20030614 08 Orpington High Street.jpg edit

File:20030614 08 Orpington High Street.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:20030614 08 Orpington High Street.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:20030614 08 Orpington High Street.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:199109xx Tony McPhee Groundhogs at Sir George Robey.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 00:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

MS Stena Lagan edit

Yes, but you made the change without saying that the article was stating the wrong measurement. Upon checking the reference, which was dead, I later found what you were talking about. I corrected the reference and added the correct template. Thank you for your help.Pennsy22 (talk) 04:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

GRT edit

Your changes to GRT - GT were wrongly flagged as post 1992, hence my reverting them initially. Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 21:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, I made a typo so your revert was understandable. Patrick Neylan (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MS Stena Scotia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

GT-GRT edit

Re BP shipping, while you are correct that the company shoud be quoting GT, it is in fact quoting GRT. Even if that is incorrect that was the reference cited says. It is one of the bugbears of the reliance on cited secondary sources. If you want to change it you should change the references as well to justify it. Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note; I understand your point, but I have to question the "rules is rules" justification for changing something we both know is right to something we both know is wrong. Patrick Neylan (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
In which case change the citation. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Warsaw Pakt edit

 

The article Warsaw Pakt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBAND. No in-depth coverage and no notable releases. Been in CAT:NN for 11 years, hence the PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 14:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Collette Marchand advert.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Collette Marchand advert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply