June 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Sherpa people because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Still spamming? Good way to get yourself blocked, and/or to get the domain blacklisted. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 07:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Passangtsherpa44 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only added those links in a good faith with an intention of providing more details to the user. Spamming or providing irrelevant detail was not the reason behind the editing Passangtsherpa44 (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As noted below, user must affirm that they will not edit about or link to website they were linking to and describe what constructive edits they would make. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now that you know you won't be permitted to do that, what do you intend to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • I might consider an unblock with an answer to 331dot's questio and an affirmation that you will not edit about or link to the website you spammed about.````-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply