User talk:Paradiver/Archive 1
DYK
editHalemaʻumaʻu.
editHi Paradiver; thanks for the addition to Halema`uma`u crater. I wonder if you'd be kind enough to put something on your userpage, please? I'd like to add you to the author list in the WP:DYK nom, but your red-linked name really stands out. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I added your name.[1] Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Replied to your current event query on my talk page. Walter Siegmund (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Archive Okina
editPlease do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tan | 39 04:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to tag that page as vandalism, sorry about that. I userfied this archive to your space here. Tan | 39 04:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- The problem is that you moved the archive into article space, not a subdirectory of the project talk page, e.g., Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii/Manual of Style/Archive 01. People like Tanthalas39, who do a wonderful job removing vandalism, vanity, and pranks, see project talk added as a new article as possible vandalism, even though you were trying to improve Wikipedia by archiving old discussions per WP:TALK. I'm going to revert your talk page archive attempt. You can try again, or someone else will do it eventually. Walter Siegmund (talk) 13:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with the above comments. After User:Tanthalas39 did you the courtesy of copying the "archive" material into a place where you could preserve it, s/he rightly noted that the erroneously-created page in article space needed to be deleted. Had s/he not copied it first, it would have been deleted and it would have been quite a bit more time-consuming for you to get it back. I deleted the leftovers and marked it as housekeeping, which I felt it was; User:Tanthalas39 had had a difficult time trying to classify exactly what had happened, which is reasonable since I've also never seen anyone try to archive project talk material into article space before. I'm sorry you've been inconvenienced. If there is something that you want to have happen with respect to this material that has not already happened, and that you feel would improve Wikipedia, please let me know what it is, as specifically as possible, please, and I'll try to help you however I can. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- The problem is that you moved the archive into article space, not a subdirectory of the project talk page, e.g., Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii/Manual of Style/Archive 01. People like Tanthalas39, who do a wonderful job removing vandalism, vanity, and pranks, see project talk added as a new article as possible vandalism, even though you were trying to improve Wikipedia by archiving old discussions per WP:TALK. I'm going to revert your talk page archive attempt. You can try again, or someone else will do it eventually. Walter Siegmund (talk) 13:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mortgage Electronic Registration System, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mortgage Electronic Registration System is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mortgage Electronic Registration System, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Image: Pele HVO
editIt appears you uploaded a photograph you took, Image:Pele_HVO.JPG, to illustrate the Pele (deity) article. It is a beautiful picture and makes the article look very nice. However, I am concerned about a possible copyright infringement. We need permission from the copyright holder of the painting you photographed. The page MediaWiki:Uploadtext/en-ownwork says "The act of scanning or photocopying someone else's work is not considered to be "creative".--Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Lovely illustration, I agree. WP:COPYREQ may be helpful, as well. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Paradiver, in a reply on my talk page, you said "The image hangs in the Volcano National Park Visitor's Center and is public property. Copyright is eligible since it is government property." I'm pretty sure that being government property doesn't put it in the public domain. If the work had been created by the government, that would be different. For example, the Smithsonian owns a lot of artwork, but I don't think it's all in the public domain. Do we know who the artist was and if it was created as part of a government contract or something? Honestly, I am no expert in these matters, I just want to make sure we tread carefully in this area. I can see if I can find a Wikipedia admin who understands copyright to help us out. Also, we can contact the National Park Visitor's Center as Walter Siegmund suggested above by pointing to WP:COPYREQ. I'm more than happy to assist, if you would like.--Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- further discussion at Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG --Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Paradiver, you continued this on my talk page, please continue it at Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG --Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- further discussion at Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG --Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Paradiver, in a reply on my talk page, you said "The image hangs in the Volcano National Park Visitor's Center and is public property. Copyright is eligible since it is government property." I'm pretty sure that being government property doesn't put it in the public domain. If the work had been created by the government, that would be different. For example, the Smithsonian owns a lot of artwork, but I don't think it's all in the public domain. Do we know who the artist was and if it was created as part of a government contract or something? Honestly, I am no expert in these matters, I just want to make sure we tread carefully in this area. I can see if I can find a Wikipedia admin who understands copyright to help us out. Also, we can contact the National Park Visitor's Center as Walter Siegmund suggested above by pointing to WP:COPYREQ. I'm more than happy to assist, if you would like.--Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
editHello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Pele_HVO.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.arthurjohnsen.com/. As a copyright violation, Image:Pele_HVO.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Pele_HVO.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. --Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 20:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Please discuss Image:Pele_HVO.JPG on its talk page
editHow many times do I have to ask this? Please stop responding on my talk page. I've copied your comments again to Image_talk:Pele_HVO.JPG. If you spread the comments out on different pages no one will be able to follow the thread. --Ishi Gustaedr (talk) 02:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Greetings from the EMS Taskforce
editI have seen your edits around Wikipedia and I feel like you would be a great addition to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Emergency medicine and EMS task force. We can always use more editors to help with improvement of EMS and emergency medicine related articles! |
- I have seen you have taken interest in EMS related articles and we currently will be doing a GA/article improvement on Emergency medical service it will be our first project as a task force and would love your input and editing, Cheers! Medicellis (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
December 2009
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Iceberg B-17B. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
File:G18 glamour lrg.jpg listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:G18 glamour lrg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Pele HVO.JPG listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pele HVO.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File:IMG 8473Iron.JPG missing description details
editIf the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Possibly unfree File:IMG 8154KAMI.JPG
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 8154KAMI.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)