December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Volgograd has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  – iridescent 19:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Moscow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. You have made other similar deletions. Please Stop removing 'Sister City' sections without explanation. Please raise the subject on the articles Talk page first. Marek.69 talk 20:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confusion edit

Could you please explain why you have left a warning for me about my edit on Saint Petersburg? Marek.69 talk 20:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the warning. Please don't throw accusations without proof, and present it at the user's talk page. Also notice that, just because two editors agree on something, it does not automatically mean that they are friends or that they have allied to force a change on a page. Sometimes people will just agree on stuff. For the next time, take into account that you need a bit more than just coincidence on one edit to accuse someone of making an edit because of being a friend of someone else. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Enric, this guy is simply a moron. Noby wants these stupid sister city lists on Wikipedia!I have warned him and have an administator ready to block him. I will remove as many of his edits as I can find PanthaV (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Simply because YOU don't want the sister cities list doesn't mean NOBODY wants them. If you and Marek can't agree, leave it to a third party. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Kindly keep out of this. Not your problem! User: Marek69 is very soon be off Wikipedia! He is moron and will be bannedPanthaV (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beyond the problems in the tone of your messages, you accuse sockpuppetry but provide zero evidence? DMacks (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have agreement of 3 administrators that users:Marek69 is big problem and will be banned immediately. He is known sockpuppeteer!!!

I'm an administrator handling this situation at the moment. No proof, no notice on WP:SSP? Not gonna get the results you want. DMacks (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply