Look at the history again. I didn't remove it someone else did. I turned the website as a reference. Got the wrong user there. But the article did look a bit like a ad. Regardless I did what I could not to have it deleted. I haven't seen any dif like this before so this is interesting to me. Like I said before I didn't delete the bulk content. I just tried to not make it as much like a ad as you did. I suggest you upload the exploded dif view on the website if you can access rights to it. Then start adding content.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)