Welcome!

edit
Hello, Pangitnatawo888, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Pangitnatawo888, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 01:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Awkwafina, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 05:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Izaac Wang. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 05:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harley Bird, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Harley Bird was changed by Pangitnatawo888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855181 on 2021-06-19T05:34:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Lea Salonga, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ----Rdp060707|1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 05:38, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lavalulu Abydos Ocame (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Pangitnatawo888! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lavalulu Abydos Ocame (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lavalulu Abydos Ocame (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lavalulu Abydos Ocame (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Blogs are not reliable sources and just written yesterday - clearly not notbale
KylieTastic (talk) 12:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lavalulu Abydos Ocame for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavalulu Abydos Ocame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavalulu Abydos Ocame until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lavalulu Abydos Ocame. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Eostrix. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of When Cinderella becomes a boy Part 3 (2020 film) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article When Cinderella becomes a boy Part 3 (2020 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When Cinderella becomes a boy Part 3 (2020 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:CalabazaFénix2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CalabazaFénix2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply