Pandaplodder
 | Please read this box first! Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic by placing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the very end, and please remember, assume good faith! You can click here to start a new topic. |
Thank you for your effort edit
|
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| For all your effort towards British cadet articles. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 17:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
Hi. This edit of yours added an AfD for Essex Police Special Constabulary into an AfD I had just submitted for something else. Looking at the article page, you seem to have PRODded it. Those are different processes - see WP:Deletion. I would think PROD would be adequate in this case, it looks uncontroversial. Which did you mean to do? Can I help? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Air Experience Flight articles edit
Hi - IMHO, it seems excessive to illustrate these articles with multiple photos of near-identical Grob Tutors, especially when some or all of the aircraft pictured appear not to be associated with the particular unit that is the subject of the article (not to mention the fact that the Tutor has only been used the AEFs for the last 10 or so years). I suggest one photo of a Tutor per article would be sufficient. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 11:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC).
My edits edit
Picture formatting was per Wikipedia:IMGSIZE. Placement to the right avoids stacking bullets next to the picture edge.
Unit infoboxes are used for the unit in the article. Air Training Corps Activities is effectively an extension of the Air Training Corps article which is not the same as the unit. While an unit infobox is not suitable for the article, have you considered a navbox linking together ATC related articles? GraemeLeggett (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Octavia Hill and the Army Cadets edit
Hello, Pandaplodder. I have been expanding the Octavia Hill article, and I saw your comment on the talk page to the effect that she didn't start the Cadets. The sources I've seen seem to say that she did. Perhaps I'm missing some important nuance. If you have a moment would you mind having another look and adding your comments to the talk page? One wants to get these things spot on. Tim riley (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
The first Cadet Unit in Scotland, possibly even the UK, was formed in Kircaldy, Fife in 1859. At that time Octavia Hill would have been 21, and living hundreds of miles away. Added to the fact that she only got involved with one Cadet unit in the 1880s, this shows that she did not form the CCF or ACF. For information, the Kircaldy unit still exists today as Kircaldy Detachment, Black Watch Battalion Army Cadet Force. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.46.85.126 (talk) 13:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Pandaplodder, I want to let you know that I am thinking about deleting the infobox you created for the Australian Air Force Cadets page, please have a look at the talk page for my reasons. Callanecc 14:00 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Army Cadet Force units for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Army Cadet Force units is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Army Cadet Force units until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Stephen Taylor (academic) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
—BarrelProof (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
File:RMP shoulder badges 1.jpg listed for deletion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RMP shoulder badges 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
August 2013 edit
Hello, Pandaplodder. I noticed your post on Thomas.W's page. Please don't try to edit war this item into Strickland (surname). I see you have already been referred to the guideline WP:NLIST. Please read it, and don't revert again. Bishonen | talk 20:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC).
Nomination of Stephen Taylor (academic) for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Taylor (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Taylor (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
File:4 Para DZ.GIF listed for deletion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:4 Para DZ.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. User:GKFXtalk 17:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Operation Summer Nights edit
The article Operation Summer Nights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not Notable. See Wikipedia:Notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Timestamp: 20150104005238 00:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Operation Summer Nights edit
The article Operation Summer Nights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not Notable. See Wikipedia:Notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Timestamp: 20150104005238 00:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Forterra plc edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Forterra plc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 17:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Pandaplodder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Pandaplodder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Action Centered Leadership listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Action Centered Leadership. Since you had some involvement with the Action Centered Leadership redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Navy Provost Armband.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Pandaplodder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:GVC paintshop pro 4024.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Institute of Customer Service for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Customer Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Customer Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 19:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 5 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |