User talk:PamD/Archive 16
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello PamD,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Re: Percival Everett by Virgil Russell
Ironically, a review on Amazon:
This new novel by the prolific and always inventive Everett will, with its odd title alone, bedevil librarians...
Women in Red October 2023
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
.png){kind=link}
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
National Trust pilot 2
Hello! Thanks for your with the National Trust 2022 pilot. Based on that work, the National Trust is supporting a second pilot, and some information is here WP:GLAM/National Trust. All the best Lajmmoore (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
I need your input, if I may. I think we need a disambiguation page for Yoko Matsuoka, but I am also aware that part of the issue is that Yoko (name) has many variants in Japanese, but only one in English. For example, my subject's name in Japanese is 松岡洋子, but English speakers confuse her with 松岡陽子 Yoko Matsuoka McClain and then there is the actress Yōko Matsuoka who has the same spelling as my subject. Not sure how to address those issues and also am never sure about making disamb pages because I do it so rarely. I guess my question is since this is en.WP, should we have the disamb page and note the Japanese spellings or just use the English spellings? I appreciate your expertise and thank you for any help you can give. SusunW (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've made a dab page at Yoko Matsuoka. I haven't added any Japanese characters: I don't think we usually include them in dab pages. I've amended the hatnote at Yōko Matsuoka, which may not be strictly necessary now as the unaccented version of the name is the dab page, but it seems useful. I've made the redirect from Yoko Matsuoka (disambiguation) to the dab page.
- I've added her to the surname page at Matsuoka#Arts_and_entertainment, hoping I've done it right - there's a scary template I've never used before! Always something new to learn.
- I know nothing about Japanese characters, nor about Wikipedia's conventions for dealing with them, so I can't offer any expertise.
- Aargh ... just noticed that the one English-language source for Yōko Matsuoka spells her as Youka! Got to go out right now, might check back later. PamD 17:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello PamD:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
The Blackpool topic[edit source]
Greetings - I noted you likely are much more of a stakeholder in the Blackpool article - I did make many bold and strident changes - and I documented them as such in the audit trail of the edits - many apologies if I pushed this too far.
Sadly, the reversion by @DragonofBatley deleted other more conservative edits - the sizing of the images is the most notably visual loss of quality by these wholesale resets.
As with most matters there is a middle ground and sure - I have no interest in edit wars and I was crystal clear that I did think my edits - pushed the 'consensus boundaries' - but no one reacted negatively - until this day.
I focus on medical and science articles and there is less room for bombast and group think in such articles -
I did actually think the changes others made - size of images - should be reverted - but I am not getting directly involved.
Kind Regards, Dr. BeingObjective (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @BeingObjective Blackpool isn't on my watchlist, and I think I'll stay out of the acrimonious scrap taking place there: huge amounts of changes seem to have been made to the article and I'm not interested enough in the place, or the article, to input the time it would take to consider whose version is better. Good luck to all involved. PamD 23:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - it is resolved - I hope. BeingObjective (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
AfD comment update
Hi! Just earlier, I made a small correction to my comment at the Julie Zeilinger AfD regarding the type of source I mentioned. I said it was an entire book, but it's just a chapter of the book. Wanted to let you know since you mentioned it in your comment before I fixed my error. Best, Bridget (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Community health NHS trusts
A tag has been placed on Category:Community health NHS trusts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 59
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
- Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
- Tech tip: Library access methods
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Citation Barnstar |
| For your work on sourcing and improving Tatjana Đekanović! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
WMUK 2023 Community Meeting
It was good to chat with you and The wub yesterday. For details of the WMUK meeting and its lightning talks, please see the blog and videos which have just been published. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Andrew Davidson Thanks: I rummaged around the website yesterday without finding it, but if it didn't go up till today that explains a lot! PamD 17:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings!
.JPG)
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, @Dr. Blofeld: let's hope 2024 is a good year for the encyclopedia and all its editors! Yuletide Greetings to you. PamD 19:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mikron Theatre Company logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mikron Theatre Company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
|
Merry Christmas, PamD! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. And for all the help you've thrown my way over the years. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 02:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
| Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
FYI - Lists and bolding of first column
Re your first-column bolding comment at AFD Women in Guam History. The bolding is for screen readers for the visually impaired. Same thing with the bolding of the column headers. I learned about it at Wikipedia:FLC, where the scope (bolding) is almost mandatory to pass table format for the Featured status. If you open it to the edit screen you see the terms scope="col" and scope="row". That's whet it's for - screen readers. — Maile (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2023 (UTCfor
Season's Greetings to all
Best wishes for Christmas / Yule / New Year to all my fellow-editors. For a little Christmas music I commend a couple of pieces done by Choir of the Earth (and yes, I'm among the singers): Midwinter and Vaughan Williams' Fantasia of Christmas Carols (both YouTube videos with amazing visuals from the technical team). PamD 23:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Sally Wainwright
Hello Pam, and Merry Christmas!
I've just given the lead of the article about Sally Wainwright a bit of a spruce up, and I was wondering if you'd mind checking my efforts. I don't generally edit biographies of living people, but I believe you do as part of the 'Women in Red' project and so I thought it would be sensible to call on your expertise. Don't worry if you can't help for whatever reason. Best wishes, A.D.Hope (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @A.D.Hope It looks fine. I've made a redirect from Sally Anne Wainwright, and added her birthdate in Wainwright (surname) (went there to check that she was listed). Will have another look later ... am editing on phone while listening to Carols from Kings. PamD 15:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Have tweaked refs: the one you added was already in use, twice uncombined! Have combined to the long ref-name chosen by an earlier editor. (Before spotting the other 2, I had renamed your VE-generated ":0" using the wonderful RefRenamer tool: I strongly dislike VE's naming style.) PamD 16:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Stub instructions
The reason I attempted to improve WP:stub is this. I feel that the instructions, which appear to date back to the earliest days of Wikipedia, have not kept up with the times. Abductive (reasoning) 19:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
|
Merry Christmas, PamD! Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity. |
.jpg)
|
2024 appeal
At my previous appeal I was advised to draft my appeal which is at User:Crouch, Swale/Appeal and show it to at least 1 experienced user, as you commented on several of the previous discussions I'm wandering what you think of the draft and if you have any advice, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale I've been out all day, looking at a few things now on phone, will have more of a look on desktop and comment tomorrow. But for now I'd say that the Windermere and Bowness article had a missing comma, a poorly formatted url i infobox, and an unsourced vague date (fixed those), and needs a description of the parish boundary which is quite quirky covering the majority of the eponymous lake and extending up into the mountains including Yoke, as shown in Nomis2011 and on OS mapping. Could also do with some coordinates. Enough for tonight! Cheers. PamD 23:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've added a missing ref for the Bowness merger but I'm not sure refs are needed for the formation of Westmorland and Furness, I think the refs in Westmorland and Furness and South Lakeland cover that. Maps would be useful but we currently have few maps for parishes outside the East Riding of Yorkshire and Derbyshire, see List of civil parishes in the East Riding of Yorkshire. The coords seem fine as they are for Langstone House the council's meeting place, what coords were you thinking about adding. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale I didn't see that it had coords - not displayed in mobile view, not visible in infobox, not there as a separate template at end of article. It doesn't seem helpful to put them in infobox template and not display them there. Even without a map, a verbal description of the extent of the parish seems appropriate, as it goes so far south and north of the settlements. I think the Nomis2011 data would be an adequate source for such a description, though I know there has been discussion about whether .as can be used as sources. Are those adjoining parishes in order, if so it would be helpful to describe them (eg "X in the north, followed in a clockwise direction by ... " or "X to the north, y and z to the northeast ... ".
- Another busy day, again editing on phone, still not answered your actual request, sorry! Perhaps tomorrow. PamD 18:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've added a missing ref for the Bowness merger but I'm not sure refs are needed for the formation of Westmorland and Furness, I think the refs in Westmorland and Furness and South Lakeland cover that. Maps would be useful but we currently have few maps for parishes outside the East Riding of Yorkshire and Derbyshire, see List of civil parishes in the East Riding of Yorkshire. The coords seem fine as they are for Langstone House the council's meeting place, what coords were you thinking about adding. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year, PamD!
PamD,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year 2024!
|
Happy New Year! |
Hello PamD: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this messageCAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Manual of Style/Words to Watch
For the sake of any of my talk page watchers: the link to the page under discussion is Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch PamD 19:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, my motivation for adding the comma is purely grammatical. The ‘and’ there separates two independent clauses (‘many do not last’ is an ind clause), which requires punctuation in addition to the conjunction.
im totally open to finding a mutually agreeable solution. I don’t see how the comma changes the meaning of either clause, but I’m plenty open to being persuaded that it does. In any case, Wikipedia’s style guidelines on punctuation require a comma (plausibly a semicolon) to separate the two independent clauses joined by the ‘and’ conjunction.
cCan you help me understand how the meaning of the sentence changes with the addition of a comma? In any case, I absolutely want to preserve the intended meaning, but must respectfully urge that some kind of change is appropriate, as, without any punctuation, it is simply improper grammatically.
I imagine we can fairly easily find an alternative construction that conveys the meaning intended without violating a basic rule of grammar. Cheers, and Happy New Year! (and, apologies for not explaining my rationale for the change! 🤦♂️) Huskerdru (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Huskerdru Please remember to link to ant page you are duscussing in a talk page, to help other editors, especially those editing on phones.
- The sentence is: "They should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable and many do not last. "
- Without the comma, I read this as:
- They should generally be avoided because (a) their definitions tend to be unstable and [because](b) many do not last.
- With the comma, it reads as:
- (a)They should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable, and (b)many do not last.
- (There's probably a third interpretation as:
- They should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable and many [of the definitions] do not last. !)
- I think the first meaning is intended, so that the comma leads the reader to a different meaning.
- Perhaps:
- They should generally be avoided, because their definitions tend to be unstable and many of the terms do not last.
- That comma seems helpful, and "the terms" clarifies. Would you find that acceptable? PamD 15:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the correction on needing to link to page! I will do so consistently in future.
- I disagree with your stated rationale regarding possible difference in meaning, but it’s not a hill I’d die on. I think your proposed restatement improves on what’s there now, but, again, that last ‘and’ precedes an independent clause (‘Many of the terms do not last’ would be a valid sentence in its own right), one of the few areas of punctuation where the requirement is clear. If you still don’t like the comma there, I’d suggest something like:
- They should generally be avoided, because: their definitions tend to be unstable; and, many of the terms [or, ‘many neologisms] do not last.
- Or something in that neighborhood. Lemme know if I’m making little sense, which, heaven knows, happens often enough. Cheers,
- Huskerdru (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and I totally agree that adding ‘the terms’ does, indeed, clarify.
- Huskerdru (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Huskerdru As an educated mother-tongue British English-speaker I'm not familiar with the rigid requirement you describe, about the need for a piece of punctuation to separate two independent clauses. I don't think I've ever come across it. Perhaps my very academic school was going through a liberal phase during my 1960s education. Where within Wikipedia is the grammatical advice to which you refer? I wonder if it's possible that this is something Americans are more particular about than other users of English?
- I hope that your final suggestion, with a colon, semicolon and comma, was a joke. PamD 08:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I’m sorry you’ve opted for snark instead of cooperation. One good source, that Wikipedia includes in its style guides, is Oxford Univeristy Press’s Modern English Use (Comma#Separation of clauses), so, no, it’s very much British in origin, and among the most basic requirements of punctuation in English—don’t string together two sentences without punctuation. Perhaps it was not your school that was the issue in your lack of familiarity with it; I’m quite confident it was taught. I won’t belabor the issue or re-revert the change. I truly am interested in finding common ground, not insulting my fellow editors. The fact remains, however, it’s required. Huskerdru (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and, no, not a joke, though the semicolon was a typo. Huskerdru (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Huskerdru No snark or insult intended, just real puzzlement and a simple request to know where in the Wikipedia MOS this is, as you say, required. PamD 14:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- There's no snark there. Comma#Separation of clauses is far more tentative than you suggest, and the cases where a comma is absolutely required far fewer - essentially those where a different meaning or serious ambiguity would result from not having one. Fwiw, I have a (rather old) degree in English from what you call "Oxford Univeristy". Johnbod (talk) 14:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies! I read something into your post that you didn’t intend, mea culpa.
- yes, fair point Johnbod. “Required” is, indeed, too strong. More accurate to say it’s recommended, and, in any case, unobjectionable. But, the whole point of punctuation is clarity, and if this doesn’t improve clarity, then it serves no good purpose.
- fwiw, I’d say that’s worth quite a lot! Hmm, I call it University of Oxford. Do you generally assume we Yanks all call it by the wrong name? Some of us, at least, don’t. Huskerdru (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you had "Oxford Univeristy Press" just above, but no doubt that was just a typo. Johnbod (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- No typo, the publishing house is, indeed, called Oxford University Press (https://corp.oup.com/)…I did a lot of work with many good folk at OUP during my time at JSTOR. Huskerdru (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you had "Oxford Univeristy Press" just above, but no doubt that was just a typo. Johnbod (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Huskerdru Agreed, clarity is all-important. We have "A because B and C", meaning "A because (B and C)". If we add a comma before "and", I think it then reads as "(A because B), and C". (Me, I'm a maths graduate ... with, coincidentally, an MSc in Information Studies.) So I think the added comma "serves no good purpose", to use your words. Perhaps the whole sentence is clumsy and needs to be rethought? PamD 18:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, your A-B-C notation makes much clearer to me how you saw the comma changing the possible reading of the sentence, thanks.
- and, agreed, I think you also ably demonstrate that the sentence, however punctuated, could be reformulated for greater clarity. I’ll give it a few minutes’ thought and come up with a couple suggestions Huskerdru (talk) 19:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and, no, not a joke, though the semicolon was a typo. Huskerdru (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I’m sorry you’ve opted for snark instead of cooperation. One good source, that Wikipedia includes in its style guides, is Oxford Univeristy Press’s Modern English Use (Comma#Separation of clauses), so, no, it’s very much British in origin, and among the most basic requirements of punctuation in English—don’t string together two sentences without punctuation. Perhaps it was not your school that was the issue in your lack of familiarity with it; I’m quite confident it was taught. I won’t belabor the issue or re-revert the change. I truly am interested in finding common ground, not insulting my fellow editors. The fact remains, however, it’s required. Huskerdru (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Pam
I am very thankful and appreciative of your edits to my first article! I can't help hoping you are proud of me as you are my auntie on here. I have learned to tidy up!! If you have a moment I am also proud of my edits to Momtaza Mehri. So many tidy-ups! When I was doing my linkings to The Complete Works (poetry) I came on this page Victoria Adukwei Bulley It is a terrible mess, so bad I ran away! Maybe you will look one day. NoorStores (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores Most of VAB's page seems to be pretty much as I created it. What do you see as "a terrible mess"? There is little biographical info and no date of birth, because there seems to be nothing published. PamD 17:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Pam, I was remembering the wrong poet! I have been on a lightening tour of every one on the Complete Works Programme now and I got confused.
- Victoria is in good shape but I must go back and put in Rathbones Folio Prize and John Pollard prize. NoorStores (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores That's a relief! Who was the mess? PamD 17:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Pam I am concerned about Mona Arshi. She is a good poet! Her page is long and looks fine, but when you look at it the citations do not match up to the information. And I was not sure what was what, either, what was relevant. When I was tidying Momtaza Mehri it was easier because several links just didn't work and lots of information was missing so I was sure of what to do. But this gave me a headache, and I ran away! NoorStores (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores Please try to remember to link any page you talk about in a talk page post: I shouldn't have had to copy and paste, or type, Mona Arshi.
- I'm short of time right now, heading out to the funeral of an amazing 92-year-old who was an active member, with his rollator, of a supported walking group with which I volunteer, but I'll try and have a look at it some time. I see the article has been around for a while, with contributions from several different editors. PamD 11:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I see the article Mona Arshi was started in 2015 by @Uhooep, who is still an active editor, so they might like to have a look at it. PamD 11:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Pam, I apologise. I am learning! Just dashing to work now, thank you as ever for guidance. NoorStores (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I see the article Mona Arshi was started in 2015 by @Uhooep, who is still an active editor, so they might like to have a look at it. PamD 11:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Pam I am concerned about Mona Arshi. She is a good poet! Her page is long and looks fine, but when you look at it the citations do not match up to the information. And I was not sure what was what, either, what was relevant. When I was tidying Momtaza Mehri it was easier because several links just didn't work and lots of information was missing so I was sure of what to do. But this gave me a headache, and I ran away! NoorStores (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores That's a relief! Who was the mess? PamD 17:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Pam!!!
The Tomiwa Olowade article was published, all thanks to you! I'm at work but sneaking into Wiki! I'm addicted! NoorStores (talk) 14:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores Or even Tomiwa Owolade! It's always worth glimpsing back at an edit to look out for surprising red links. I'm glad that my nudging to Drmies was successful. Yes, editing can become quite addictive and a huge timesink. I'm lucky enough to be retired, but even so there are other things I ought to spend more time on! PamD 19:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Edits to Olive Clarke
Hi Pam, apologies I got cut off mid-sentence on my last edit to the Olive Clarke page (the problems with editing Wikipedia on mobile!). I removed (died) "peacefully in her sleep" as per WP:EUPHEMISM as I believe it to be non-encyclopaedic language like "slipped on" or "passed away". As per is standard, nationality should usually go at the start of the lead. Mentioning age in section about death is important too, especially when no infobox is present. As for beginning new paragraphs with "She"... I don't personally like this, but this one I won't fight you on if you wish to restore these. If you want to keep these changes off the page please let me know why below and we'll work together to make a better version. Hope you have a great day. Thanks! Jkaharper (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Jkaharper Apologies: problems of mobile editing! I managed to get confused as to which direction the edit was going - perhaps couldn't believe that I hadn't created the article in the standard "A is a [nationality] [occupation]" form! Of course your version is the correct, standard one: I thought I was reverting in the other direction. And the other changes are fine too, though I'm not sure that "peacefully in her sleep" is really a euphemism: it's a truth, saying she didn't fall off a stepladder, or die in agony with cancer. It's not the same as using "passed away" etc: I wrote that she died. But as my only source for that statement is a Facebook post, I won't argue it.
- I've now, as a reminder, added "[nationality]" to my boilerplate outline for biographies, having shockingly forgotten it this time!
- Sorry again about the bad early-morning revert. Happy New(ish) Year! PamD 14:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- No excuse really, but I was working on Clarke's article in a bit of a hurry, hoping to get it finished before her funeral the next day, having been reminded by seeing signposts for car-parking for the funeral (car-parking at the county show ground, shuttle buses to the parish church up its narrow lane) while driving my husband back from a hospital appt (she'd been on my "maybe to write one day" list for a while, but this nudged me). I still can't find a copyright-free photo, although there are plenty in the newspapers, and no-one in the WI Federation seems to have both a photo they've taken and are happy to share and the technical confidence to try uploading it. (I might contact the Young Farmers and see if they've got anyone who could help.)
- I don't think my membership of Cumbria-Westmorland Federation of WIs counts as a COI, though I did speak to Olive a couple of times at county-wide meetings. An extraordinary person. PamD 14:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
Keyerzozie page
Pam, I've mentioned it before, but you ROCK. You remind of my Auntie Z in Pakistan. She is the strict one, but all the cousins' favourite because she is the fair and kind one. NoorStores (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores Thank you! "Fair" and "kind" are how I hope to be in editing Wikipedia, though I sometimes get a bit impatient too! I hadn't seen all the recent discussions until just earlier today, and wasn't about to get involved in the main discussion, but I did notice that that one editor seemed to have been editing as a COI editor for 20 years. It'll be interesting to see whether they respond. (For talk page watchers: this is about User talk:Keyserzozie#Possible conflict of interest).
- I see some other editors have suggested this too, but you might do better to concentrate on creating new well-sourced articles on neglected poets and other writers, and step back from the Clanchy et al maelstrom. There are some red links in the author column for The Writers' Prize, mostly poets, and also the Somerset Maugham Award: being a winner or shortlisted for one of those is a good start for notability, and you then need to find a few reviews in solid WP:RS, and go on from there. Less stressful, but very useful to the encyclopedia, and to diversity if you choose suitably diverse people to write about! PamD 16:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- good idea Pam. I am very very happy with my The Complete Works (poetry) page. I know it is useful, and many people have linked to it, and I can imagine many people like me studying publishing using it in the future. It just made me happy to publish it. I will look up those red links for sure!
- I will add 'brave' and 'kind' to my description of you. Also true of Auntie Z. NoorStores (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- GREAT tip Pam! I am going to do Zaffar Kunial! It would never occur to me he did not have a page! NoorStores (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Pam, You are very very brave!Thank you again. I think men like Mr Troutman speak for themselves though. Nobody could respect that.
- Advice, please, do you think I should take Keyserzozie to Conflict of Interest page? I think she should say she is working for Joanne Harris on her talk page and on her articles? There is a badge for this I see. NoorStores (talk) 12:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- PS I have started on Zaffar Kunial. NoorStores (talk) 12:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Pam, I've been listening to my mum and big brother, and I'm leaving Wiki for at least a good bit. I have told them about you and they agree you are QUEEN and also a lot like Auntie Z. My mother said Auntie Z would put her hand in the fire for you, and my brother said, not if she could think of something smarter to do first!
- You would think of something smarter.
- I feel you have taught me about being a bigger person. And always to reference after the full stop! I hope I will meet you in person one day.
- NOOR NoorStores (talk) 14:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- PS I have started on Zaffar Kunial. NoorStores (talk) 12:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- GREAT tip Pam! I am going to do Zaffar Kunial! It would never occur to me he did not have a page! NoorStores (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of National Day of Reflection (UK).png
.png){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of National Day of Reflection (UK).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.png){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Please check this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Keyserzozie/Archive I don't think this is a fair record of what you did. I'm logging out now and staying out. NoorStores (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoorStores I don't think I harassed them, and nor does the SPI report suggest that I did. I'd have liked to see a reply to my question as to whether they had been a paid editor while doing their earlier work on the JH etc articles, but I asked it three days after their last edit (under that editor name!), so no surprise to get no response.
- I've replied to "logging out now and staying out" at User talk:NoorStores#Goodbye or .... PamD 15:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Margaret Parker (Q18762034)
A tag has been placed on Margaret Parker (Q18762034) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- So, just checking, @Fram and @Deb Was creating that redirect the right thing to do? I found her as a red link in Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Temperance worker, and discovered that she already had an article as Margaret Eleanor Parker. I reckoned that creating the redirect would save other WiR editors from wasting time thinking about, or making, a duplicate article for her. I think I checked that she was already linked as a hatnote from the article which was then at the base name of Margaret Parker, and I also did what I could to get the two Wikidata entries combined. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Another redirect, Henrietta Brown (Q115787698). Was it correct to create this redirect as a temporary measure? PamD 15:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think this needs to be solved at Wikidata level, by merging/redirecting the duplicate entry to the existing one, not by "polluting" enwiki (I mean it less accusatory than it probably sounds, I don't mean to claim that you were vandalizing or anything similar). Take for example Ida Henrietta HydeWD entry and Ida HydeWD entry. At Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Inventors, we have a redlink for Ida Hyde (Q122841752), but what needs to be done is not the creation of this redlink, but the removal (as a separate entry) of the duplicate Wikidata entry: when this is done, the next run of Listeriabot should remove the entry from the WiR list. Until that next run, you could also edit the WiR list to point to the right article on enwiki of course. Fram (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I hadn't looked at the history carefully enough. @Fram is right, of course. Deb (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Deb@Fram Thanks, both. So another time I should fix the WikiData duplication, and then pipe the redlink in the table to the existing article, because the next run to produce an updated table will not include an entry for this person because the duplicate WikiData entry which was creating it will no longer exist. I think I've got that clear now! "Every day a school day" when it comes to editing Wikipedia (especially in the somewhat baffling territory of Wikidata). I hope I can remember it next time I find one of these. PamD 16:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think this needs to be solved at Wikidata level, by merging/redirecting the duplicate entry to the existing one, not by "polluting" enwiki (I mean it less accusatory than it probably sounds, I don't mean to claim that you were vandalizing or anything similar). Take for example Ida Henrietta HydeWD entry and Ida HydeWD entry. At Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Inventors, we have a redlink for Ida Hyde (Q122841752), but what needs to be done is not the creation of this redlink, but the removal (as a separate entry) of the duplicate Wikidata entry: when this is done, the next run of Listeriabot should remove the entry from the WiR list. Until that next run, you could also edit the WiR list to point to the right article on enwiki of course. Fram (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome! Thank you so much for joining the drive. When I perform a scan of articles belong to Category:Women writers and Category:All articles lacking sources using PetScan, I found that there are 52 articles:
- Ida Nyrop Ludvigsen
- Ifigeneia Giannopoulou
- Jana Černá
- Eufrosinia Kersnovskaya
- Hanni Ossott
- Pilar de Lusarreta
- Quenby Fung
- Nienke van Hichtum
- Ansen Dibell
- Ida Vos
- Susanna Highmore
- Charlotte Fielden
- Spunk (play)
- Leonor López de Córdoba
- Martha Cheavens
- Ling Li (writer)
- Clardeluna
- Kayla Parker
- Tamar Fish Nachshon
- Jennifer Dawson
- Peggy Sloane
- Dagon Khin Khin Lay
- Lina Ramann
- Aroti Dutt
- Eleni Ourani
- Dickinson Electronic Archives
- Georgette Vallejo
- Madeleine Schlumberger
- Susana Molinari Leguizamón
- Edythe Morahan de Lauzon
- Geneviève Fauconnier
- Sigrid Boo
- Marcia Levin
- Kumari Radha
- Constanza Ossorio
- Elysa Ayala
- Ana Pelegrín
- María Nieves y Bustamante
- Stefania Mosca
- Kata Szidónia Petrőczy
- Jeannie Ebner
- Ehrengard Schramm
- Saeeda Faiz
- Anna Zay
- List of Greek women writers
- List of Bolivian women writers
- Pooran (singer)
- Margarita Rudenko
- List of experimental women writers
- Liu Zunqi
- Something Childish
- Gloria Alcorta
Since you are a member of the WP:Women in Red project, I think you might be interested in these articles and you might want to practice your citation skills on them. Anyways, I wish you good luck on the drive on February 1! You'll need it. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @CactiStaccingCrane Dipping into a couple of those at random, I think I'm going to need to brush up my knowledge of what is and isn't a WP:RS for people like SF writers! I might have a go at some of these, in Feb, or I might go for the random approach or pick a chunk of the alphabet of the general listing. I've not used PetScan but had a go at changing your "Women writers" to "British women", still intersecting with unsourced, which produces an interesting batch of 56 articles ... including the baffling Scotland's Forgotten Valour. I can only think that the category Category:Victoria Cross books got interpreted as "Books by the (female) writer called Victoria Cross"! Several of the others need access to "Debretts" or similar: I might even make a list of those and pop it on the talk page of a relevant Wikiproject. I'll enjoy doing something with these, in Feb. Makes a change from fractious discussions about spats between twittering writers. PamD 15:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very glad that you enjoy the drive, indeed it is also an excuse for me to not joining any AfD and getting suck into nasty debates. There's another more convenient way to find articles than using PetScan, which is
[search term] incategory:"All articles lacking sources". It's pretty interesting what you can found on there. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very glad that you enjoy the drive, indeed it is also an excuse for me to not joining any AfD and getting suck into nasty debates. There's another more convenient way to find articles than using PetScan, which is
Books & Bytes – Issue 60
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
- Three new partners
- Google Scholar integration
- How to track partner suggestions
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deserts of Greece
A tag has been placed on Category:Deserts of Greece indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Did you mean to title this without the "h"? The Ordnance Survey and all 3 sources in the article call it "Clach-bheinn". Should it be moved without redirect at WP:RMT to Clach-bheinn, Highland or just Clach-bheinn? Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale Thanks for spotting that! I've fixed it, I think. Have spent too much of this afternoon sorting out another pair of confused Scottish mountains, going off at tangents from WP:FEB24. All very satisfying, filling in bits of the jigsaw. I see you noticed my new parish article yesterday and gave it an infobox, thanks. PamD 17:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Great Lives
I finished with the available categories for Great Lives. You can proceed with updating the text. Dimadick (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eleonara Amalia Maria Adelborg
A tag has been placed on Eleonara Amalia Maria Adelborg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Misspelled. --DaizY (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DaizY (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eleonara Adelborg
A tag has been placed on Eleonara Adelborg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Misspelled. --DaizY (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DaizY (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
Museumand article
Hi, @PamD, just alerting you to an AfD discussion I've started at an article you created. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 20:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It's currently just a blank page – would you like it deleted or as a redirect? DanCherek (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted, please: I created another redirect at Knockbrack (Dublin) in line with other Irish mountains. Thanks. PamD 23:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"No point in piping"
Re: this edit in future it would perhaps be better for you to make such an edit as a fresh one, rather than by undoing me. My edit was, as was clearly labelled, reverting block evasion. I'm sure you don't want people to mistakenly assume you are editing on behalf of the evader. DuncanHill (talk) 11:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @DuncanHill I'm not sure it's necessary to revert every edit by a blocked editor: WP:BANREVERT says "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." Avoiding a pipe to a redirect is slightly less clearcut than fixing a typo or vandalism, but pretty near.
- I don't think anyone would say I was editing on behalf of the evader, when my edit summary explains my reasoning for the edit.
- But, to keep you happy, I'll undo my undoing, and then make the sensible change. ... Done.
- It's an article verging on the AFD-able in any case: no evidence that NT or anyone else uses the term "Wasdale, Eskdale and Duddon" as one entity. I came across it when looking at the Petscan intersection of Category:Articles lacking sources and Category:Cumbria for WP:FEB24: it was one which I gave up on, but while I was looking at it I took a short cut to unpiping an unnecessary piping by reverting your edit. Will try to remember to avoid doing similar UNDOs in future. PamD 14:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion
Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Anum Qaisar.
If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.
If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.
Template for MPs
Howdy. I'm asking for the 'majority' parameter to be deleted at Template:Infobox officeholder, concerning Members of Parliament. Not sure when or why its been added. Also noticed them in the current members of the Scottish & Welsh Parliaments, along with current members of the British Parliament. These infoboxes are about officer holder, not election results. GoodDay (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I notice you didn't restore the 'vote total & percentage'. May I take it, you agree with me, such info doesn't belong in an officeholder infobox? GoodDay (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
A citation barnstar for you
For good work during WP: FEB24 Davidindia (talk) 15:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
|
|
The Citation Barnstar | |
| For good work during WP: FEB24 Davidindia (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you, it was fun ... and somewhat addictive. PamD 15:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- I seem to have come 18th in the league table for WP:FEB24; it was fun trying to improve the encyclopedia and there are few, if any, completely unsourced items left for British and Irish hills, British rivers, Cumbria (having removed the Welsh items from the category tree), City of Lancaster, and fewer than there were for Lancashire, plus some random work. WP:Petscan, which I'd always assumed was something very technical, turns out to be a very easy way to intersect category trees, so I could match Category:All articles lacking sources with anything I found interesting or had good sources for. PamD 15:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for South West Coast Path
South West Coast Path has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Books & Bytes – Issue 61
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
- Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
- 1Lib1Ref results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt Thank you! PamD 16:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
|
Citation Barnstar | |
| This award is given in recognition to PamD for collecting more than 100 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Possible unintentional COI at Museumand article/deletion discussion
Hi, @pamD, I'd like to make a friendly and helpful comment here to see what you think. I was surprised to see your comments at the deletion discussion about the PR company which I think has been involved in placing Museumand related material on various, often unverifiable, websites. There is no doubt whatever that M&H Ltd is a private company which self-describes as business PR and event organising business. Most such companies operate within a single sector, in this case museums and, at the margins, libraries. My concern about your comment is that it seems to me that your desire to present M@H Ltd in the way you have might extend from membership of what you consider a community rather than a business. I also wonder if you have been in contact with the Museumand owners since we started the deletion discussion; there is an indication to me that you might have been. I've also noticed a pattern at the deletion discussion which might suggest that supportive comments might have been solicited. I could be entirely wrong, of course, and please excuse me if I am. I would say, though, that I think if I were right then you might be in breach of COI policy and it would be better to declare a personal interest. I am not suggesting in any way that you are doing anything untoward on purpose and I have no doubt that you are editing in good faith; I do find that your efforts at the deletion discuss appear, to me, more like lobbying than a regular editing discussion. Happy to discuss further. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 11:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- I find your attitude very odd, too, intent on destroying an article and ready to make careless assertions.
- For complete clarity: Yes, I emailed Museumand, once. I'll add it to the AfD. PamD 11:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, @pamD, I'd ask you to assume good faith. I've simply proposed deletion of an article which conforms to AfD requirements and does not conform to the various WP policies I've laid out. I opened a dialogue here, not at the deletion discussion, because that is the first stage of the WP:COI process as I understand it. My view, having read what you've put at the AfD, is that your actions go beyond editing and participating in an AfD to a point where you are essentially acting as a supporter of Museumand (if it exists). In conjunction with your (no doubt accidental) misrepresentation of a commercial PR company as a 'community', which suggests to me that you may be part of that community', I think it is quite possible that you are breaching WP:COI. I won't carry on this discussion at the AfD page because that is a distraction from the AfD process. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murray (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alison Murray.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks you PamD for updating Chameli Devi Jain Award for Outstanding Women Mediapersons. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Women in Red April 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2024
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. This one.
WP:EDITSUMMARY: provide a meaningful summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors
Paradoctor (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradoctor Sorry about that: I couldn't just use "Undo" as there were two edits, and forgot that "Rollback" doesn't allow for an edit summary while "Rollback (AGF)" does. I should have gone to your talk page, or followed it up with a dummy edit with an edit summary. My reason for reverting your edit was that the QVH dab page didn't seem appropriate: anything known as "Queen Victoria Hospital" would have been on the dab page, anything else would be irrelevant. (But perhaps WP:DTR: If you look at my edit history or my edit summary analysis, you can see that 99.6% of my edits have summaries (and most of the rest are probably cases where Twinkle adds an automatic one). A "You seem to have forgotten to add a summary to this edit, I wonder if you could explain it" might have been more appropriate here.) PamD 17:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't mind the revert as such. If I did, I would have let you known.
couldn't just use "Undo"
WP:UNDO:It is also possible to undo several consecutive edits, even if they conflict among themselves: view the "diff" to be removed (by selecting the earliest and most recent revisions in the history and clicking "compare selected revisions"), and click the "undo" link.
If you look at [...] my edit summary analysis
Surprise. I did. That's why I used {{uw-wrongsummary}}, not {{uw-editsummary2}}.seem to have forgotten to add a summary
You didn't forget, the edit has an edit summary. What you neglected to do was to provide a meaningful edit summary, as per above. The way it is now, your revert could easily be read as a vandalism revert.or followed it up with a dummy edit with an edit summary
That's the thing that gets me. Why haven't you after I notified you? It's not as if there was something stopping you.- [Please don't ping me, I'm watching.] Paradoctor (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradoctor I didn't see any need as I'd explained myself to you here, but have now made a dummy edit with explanation. {{wrongsummary}} doesn't seem to match the situation of leaving an automatic edit summary, as it suggests a positive choice of inappropriate words. "Revert" is a neutral term and implies nothing. Yes, I suppose multiple "Undo"s would have worked. PamD 21:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Am on phone so can't easily correct on talkpage: I meant {{uw-wrongsummary}}. PamD 21:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the second time: Please don't ping me, I'm watching.
I'd explained myself to you here
Edit histories are permanent public record, you know that, right? If it was only for myself, then I wouldn't have asked.doesn't seem to match the situation of leaving an automatic edit summary
We're responsible for our edits, automated or not. Also note H:ES:Except for the automatic summary when creating a redirect, [...] these are not a substitute for a proper edit summary
"Revert" is a neutral term and implies nothing.
It is so neutral that it explains nothing beyond the bare fact that it is a revert. As I pointed out at the very beginning of this conversation: WP:FIESprovide a meaningful summary
[added emphasis]. Which means giving a reason, which the canned edit summary doesn't.- Perhaps more to the is that just about the only situation where lack of meaningful edit summary is widely tolerated is reversion of obvious vandalism. Which means saying "this is a revert" and nothing else carries a strong connotation of vandalism. You've been around a smidgen longer than I, this should not come as a surprise. Paradoctor (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Am on phone so can't easily correct on talkpage: I meant {{uw-wrongsummary}}. PamD 21:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradoctor I didn't see any need as I'd explained myself to you here, but have now made a dummy edit with explanation. {{wrongsummary}} doesn't seem to match the situation of leaving an automatic edit summary, as it suggests a positive choice of inappropriate words. "Revert" is a neutral term and implies nothing. Yes, I suppose multiple "Undo"s would have worked. PamD 21:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)