Palebluesam
Welcome!
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, Palebluesam! Thank you for your contributions. I am Zeromonk and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Zeromonk (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse Invitation
edit
|
Hello! Palebluesam,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Tanner has been accepted
edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thsmi002 (talk) 00:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)A page you started (Elizabeth Tanner) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Elizabeth Tanner, Palebluesam!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice job on the first attempt. I would incorporate the Honors list into her Scientific career section as prose, with citations.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Invitation to join Women in Red
edit You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.65% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Romero has been accepted
edit The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Zeromonk (talk) 16:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Elaine Chew
editHello, Palebluesam,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TomCat4680 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Elaine Chew for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
TomCat4680 (talk) 16:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I've moved this to Draft:Elaine Chew where it can be worked on at a slower pace without the threat of deletion. As I can see a citation to University College, London, it seems probable we will be able to have an article on her through meeting the notability guidelines for academics. You may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red which is a group of people dedicated to filling in missing gaps in Wikipedia's coverage of women and women's history; I'll also ping two colleagues Megalibrarygirl and Rosiestep to see if they can help with the article. I hope that all makes sense. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Adding @Jesswade88 and Victuallers: as they may have access to additional references. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Elaine Chew has been accepted
edit The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jodie Bradby
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Jodie Bradby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://physics.anu.edu.au/people/profile.php?ID=109. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 13:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Money emoji: I've trimmed most of the obvious close paraphrasing, but what remains are formal titles for papers and named posts, which can't be written any other way. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, Right then. Thanks Ritchie! 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 14:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jodie Bradby
edit
Hello, Palebluesam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jodie Bradby".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)