Your attention needed at WP:CHU edit

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 23:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit on Comparison of deep learning software edit

Hi in your edit you added the text "This section is about those with its own article page."

However this is currently not true.

Also I am not sure if the existence of an article is the right basis for inclusion/exclusion in a list.

What do you think?

VENIVIDIVICIPEDIAtalk 21:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Multiple times in the past (if you see the edit history) the article got some of it's contents removed for this reason. Apparently, Wikipedia style guide (WP:ELLIST) says lists shouldn't be composed of external links, so as long as that's there I think there's nothing we can do about it. I added that there in the hope to stop people wasting time, because it took me some time to read Talks of those that did past deletions. Regarding the need for own article, I think it's fine. I think the main problem is that one needs to prove "notability" to the "editors" to make a new article, which is something very difficult especially when you have to do it in English. Packet0 (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply