Nomination of James Dietz (artist) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Dietz (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dietz (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:42, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hey Phil-- welcome to Wikipedia. I'm also on the WikiProject for the Pritzker Military Library, and will probably be seeing you pretty soon. TeriEmbrey has let us know that you've just started, and I've looked over your work on James Dietz (artist). I know the article was nominated for deletion, but I think given the sources and the legitimate database you've used, I think it's likely to be kept. You're off to a great start. I'm not sure how much background you have in using Wikipedia, but if you're not sure of how to do something, or if you've run into a situation (e.g. deletion) where you're not sure how to proceed, please feel free to ask either Keilana or myself. We are both fairly active, but in case you need a quicker response, I'll send you an invite to the Teahouse below, where a number of experienced editors can answer any question you might have about editing or using Wikipedia. Hope to see you soon, I, JethroBT drop me a line 20:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! PMathew42, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! I, JethroBT drop me a line 20:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply


Duplication Detector

edit

Heya Phil. Feel free to use the Duplication Detector as you're developing articles to check for instances of close paraphrasing. I, JethroBT drop me a line 20:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for James Dietz

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sandra Grimes

edit

Hello, PMathew42. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sandra Grimes, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sandra Grimes to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Alex discussion 17:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Editing Pritzker Military Museum & Library

edit

Hey Phil. I saw your edit to the PMML article here earlier today. Thanks for the additions-- I think they are helpful. However, because we'd like to be careful about what goes on the article given that we are associated with the institution, from here on out, please refrain from editing the article directly for now and instead post suggested changes to the article talk page instead. We're following a process where editors not involved with the PMML can review our suggestions and implement them on the talk page. I realize this is a slower process than what you are used to, but it's a principle we agreed to follow based on conflict of interest concerns, feedback from others in the Wikipedia community, and a mutual agreement between myself, Keilana, and staff at the PMML. You may have noticed that I've edited the page recently, but these were uncontroversial (i.e. changing the name of the institution and replacing the old logo with the new one.) Basically, we need to have outside editors check our improvements before they are implemented, so please try to stick to that in the future. I, JethroBT drop me a line 20:50, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Uploading the image for Sandra Grimes.

edit

Heya. So, about uploading that image. I'm assuming that the PMML is willing to release the photograph under a free license, otherwise we cannot use it. "Wikipedia-only" permission is insufficient in this case. I would check that out with Nate and perhaps TeriEmbrey can weigh in here. There are two things that need to happen:

  1. Uploading the image: The image will need to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. If you have access to the image, you can go to this upload page to get started. It walks you through everything pretty easily. When you get to the This site requires you to provide copyright information for this work, to make sure everyone can legally reuse it instructions, select "This file is not my own work." Under "Source", you should provide a web address where the image was found, or if the photo was sent to you by the photographer (Nate), you can just say "Sent to me from photographer." Under "Author", put down Nate's name and note his affiliation with the PMML. Importantly, under the copyright choices, select "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0" Then just fill in the appropriate info about the image to describe it.
  2. Providing evidence of permission: The copyright owner (Nate, or whoever is the copyright holder of the photo-- TeriEmbrey may be able to clarify this) needs to e-mail permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with a statement of consent similar to the one found at WP:CONSENT that shows they have released the image under that specific license.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, I, JethroBT drop me a line 22:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear @PMathew42: Thank you for starting the article Sandra Grimes. I uploaded photos to Wikimedia Commons for the article. I just did a major copyedit. Please check my changes.Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rescue of Captain Phillips

edit

There already is a wikipedia article relating to the hijacking of the Maersk Alabama and the rescue of Captain Phillips. I am wanting to add some of this information to one section of the CTF 151 page. I won't give a full detailed account but only a section that is relevant to the page. Is this ok?

Edited pages on ancient battles

edit

Added thematic summaries to ancient battles, such as Cyncocephale, Pynda, and Carrhae

Added detail to Mongol Empire page

edit

Added more on Xia conflict, more changes are in progress

Ancient Macedonian Army page

edit

Added quote by Diodorus Siculus Added Orientals section to the page

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ram Villivalam Edit

edit

You made a no description edit to the page Ram Villivalam that deleted the mention of his status as the first Asian American Illinois State Senator. What was your reasoning for this deletion?--Mpen320 (talk) 04:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply