User talk:PKM/12 Jan-June 2010

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello PKM! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Terri Windling - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Dear bot, references added. - PKM (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Assessments

Could someone please assess English embroidery which I wrote and Embroidery which I substantially rewrote for quality? - PKM (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Done: B/mid and Start respectively. The EE article is great - could go to GA as it is. Johnbod (talk) 02:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for looking over my boutis revisions

Hi - thanks for taking a look at the Provencal quilt article overhaul I did. Hopefully it's a lot clearer now, and I hope it also adds to the representation of non-American quilting on Wikipedia. Really apprecioate your taking a look. Mabalu (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Picken.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picken.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Portrait of Elizabeth I

Mysterious image of snake appears on 400-year-old painting of Queen Elizabeth I.

Still tied up with work and family things... - PKM (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

help with alt text?

Hi PKM. I'm working on the alt text of the images in the Funerary art article. I'm more than a little out of my depth in many ways. One particular problem is the image below. I got as far as "A woman in a long gown standing with hands clasped prayer-like in front of her. She wears a gable hood" and then sorta gave up... could you add any further details? See below, thanks • Ling.Nut 10:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

English brass c.1540

		The Guidance Barnstar
		I award you this Guidance barnstar for your timely provision of important details regarding Tudor fashion to the Funerary art article. Thanks for your help! • Ling.Nut 23:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Elven Armor Neiman Marcus.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elven Armor Neiman Marcus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Dutch Golden Age clothes

Just come across this book by the leading expert - [1]. Also I will be getting a Margaret Scott (also leading expert) book on 14th & 15th century clothes from the library soon if you have any specific queries. How goes it? All the best. Johnbod (talk) 13:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I've only seen the online excerpts, which are very generous as regards text, but leave gaps for the pics, of which there seem to be loads. But it is pretty specialized to Rembrandt & his period. She did a short good introductory essay in: Rudi Ekkart and Quentin Buvelot (eds), Dutch Portraits, The Age of Rembrandt and Frans Hals, Mauritshuis/National Gallery/Waanders Publishers, Zwolle, 2007,ISBN 9781857093629 - which I have & have used here & there, especially in Dutch Golden Age Painting. No online excerpts from that on UK google. Johnbod (talk) 23:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mockado

Hello! Your submission of Mockado at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ErinM (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Mockado

On April 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mockado, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'm back

I think I must be back: Holy Grail tapestries.

Also, I have nominated English embroidery for Good Article status now that I have upgraded some of the images. Have at it. - PKM (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Holy Grail tapestries

Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Work to do!

There are many new images in Commons from the Britain Loves Wikipedia photo expedition to British museums that need categorizing by editors with appropriate knowledge. I am working through textiles and costumes, but there are many images works of art which would be great additions to our visual arts and design articles if people could find them. - PKM (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your message and congrats yesterday! You really are the good fairy around here, cheering me up at the right moment. For I am currently somewhat at a loss at the Dudley's Daddy's GAN review (the prose problem!); although I must say it was fun with all the others I did (Guilford and Amy are also GA now). I found this Hilliard by chance (you may have heard of it of course) and I am absolutely delighted how real they look. The miniatures are tiny and from c. 1575 (the Kenilworth year). See the file description for the press details. User Editor at Large at Commons was so kind to remove the frames, so I could put it into Elizabeth's article. Good luck and good to have you here again! Buchraeumer (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

More fun with portraits

First, the Cobbe portrait of "Shakespeare" is probably Sir Thomas Overbury. Now a portrait long thought to be Overbury may well be Sir Robert Dudley, Leicester's son. Info here. - PKM (talk) 01:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Great! I never believed the Cobbe guy was Shakespeare! Robert Dudley junior would have been 17 in 1591; but he could very well be it (the eyes!, in high resolution). Thank you so much for finding this! Buchraeumer (talk) 23:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Portrait needed

Hi PKM, I need your help in obtaining a portrait of this lady here: Louisa Montagu, Countess of Sandwich. Thank you.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

No luck so far... - PKM (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for looking. I know the Thomas Lawrence allegorical portrait is displayed at the La Salle University Art Museum.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it was on their website c. 2003-2005 - I found links to it - but it's gone now. :-( - PKM (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bourgogne-habit-c.1700.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bourgogne-habit-c.1700.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nn123645 (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Textile glossary

Hi, regarding these edits - which book was used for each entry, and what was the page number concerned? --Redrose64 (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Working on that now. - PKM (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

barnstar

		The British Museum barnstar
		Thank you for all your help with the Hoxne Hoard. Witty Lama 23:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)