Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Freemasonry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blueboar (talk) 13:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008 edit
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Grand Lodge of Connecticut. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BC (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grand Lodge of Connecticut. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. BC (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Blocked edit
--chaser - t 21:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
In general, it helps to use the article's talk page in situations like these. In this specific case, the other editors involved are distrustful of the specific piece of information without a source to verify the claim in question. Our verifiability policy puts the onus on the editor who wants to include information to find a source to verify it. I'd suggest doing a complete cite of a source if you want to include that information.--chaser - t 22:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)