Ozraptor4
Thanks for your help on the monitor article. If you know any other synonyms... I have been busy creating monitor articles where no one else has bothered after all of these years.
My knowledge is limited, however.
cheers,Bruinfan12 (talk) 12:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Rewriting edit
So, you think the stuff I've rewritten as per the talk pages of Materpiscis and Placodermi are adequate?--Mr Fink (talk) 03:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
--Hi there. Materpiscis looks ok! Placoderm page is a vast improvement but there is a great deal more to the placoderm relationship debate than just the Gogo fossils - the real clincher was Young and Goujet's work on eye-ring and braincase material in NSW material. I'm still collecting all the literature but I'll try to summarise it for laymen over the weekend. Ozraptor4 (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
G'day, What is your rationale behind the ID change from Tiliqua scincoides scincoides to Tiliqua nigrolutea? The articles are not so clear on what the key differences are. Thanks. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Ahoy there! Regarding the identity of your bluey:
1) The anterior temporal scales on this guy (those are the ones just behind the scales circling the eye) are about the same size as the other scales on the cheek (as in all Tiliqua spp. save for scincoides). In scincoides these are more than twice as long as the scales immediately behind them. This is a unique scincoides feature.
2) Scincoides has discrete transverse banding on the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the body. This fellow has an irregular reticulate pattern. Southeastern scincoides also normally have a dark temporal stripe ("bandit mask') behind the eye that is absent in this critter.
3) Finally, you state the locality as "Austin's Ferry, Tasmania, Australia". Eastern Blue-tongues aren't found in Tas, with the Blotched being the only indigenous Tiliqua.
Conclusion : Lowland morph of the Blotched Blue-tongue!(T. nigrolutea) and a really nice-looking one at that! Most books tend to use the alpine morph as an illo. of this species which looks very different (black with pink/orange blotches)
Cheers Ozraptor4 (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, have you had a look at the other image in the species article? It looks fairly different and darker. Noodle snacks (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Geez, you're right! Thats an Eastern Blue-tongue as well (smaller scales, transverse bands, temporal stripes). Since it shows the darker colouration of the southernmost animals in the range, I've transferred it to Tiliqua scincoides scincoides to demonstrate the great variability in colouration of the species (contrasting with the paler NSW animals).Ozraptor4 (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting the above-mentioned image. It doesn't look a lot like the ones shown on the current Eastern page but I guess there can be considerable colour variation. Where I come from (Canada) we have only one lizard (five-lined skink) so I get quite a kick out of seeing these guys in the southern climes. D. Gordon E. Robertson (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
|
Dinosaur sequel edit
The sequel will be offical if you believe. I'm not a troll, but I wanted to tell you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.11.217.199 (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borealosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Ozraptor4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Ozraptor4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Ozraptor4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |