Overeditor

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Cape Breton Island, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 01:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning 1

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced or inadequately referenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles. Thank you. -Kirkoconnell 15:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As mentioned on the David Suzuki talk page, the poorly sourced and contentious material you have added to the article does not meet the requirements for biographies of living persons. Sunray (talk) 07:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

My edits do not provide personal analysis and are not POV or Original Research, nor are these facts "contentious" as you claim since the facts are reported in national media and not contradicted anywhere. This is factual information from Suzuki himself as reported from national media using video and quotes from Suzuki himself (the citations are included in the article until you delete them). This is information which even Suzuki thought was an important aspect of his life's work; this is why he did nationally reported media events to draw attention to it. You are not helping him by trying to sensor people who quote this information in the article; Suzuki would want others to use these facts to do better than he does. The whole thrust of the article is focused on this issue and Suzuki's advocacy regarding greenhouse gas pollution so this is right on point and one of the most important elements of the issue.

I am glad to see that you are beginning to discuss this on the talk page but note that you continue to insert contentious material into the article. Editorial decisions are made by consensus, so please do not continue adding that material to the article until there is agreement on the talk page. Sunray (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

There is concensus with the exception of you and Victoriagirl. You can't take over the site just with threats.

Attacks

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at David Suzuki, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. <eleland/talkedits> 17:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Last warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to David Suzuki, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. <eleland/talkedits> 21:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Overeditor for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Victoriagirl (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)