Othmanskn

Welcome!

Hello, Othmanskn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction

 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia

  How to edit a page

  Help

  Tips

  How to write a great article

  Manual of Style

  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  kawaputra^torque 13:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as you did to Bajau. This is a simple mistake to make and by now should have been corrected. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 07:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
OK. It is noted.Othmanskn 10:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Matlan Marjan

A tag has been placed on Matlan Marjan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 12:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Matlan Marjan

The article for Matlan Marjan was deleted because it didn't make any specific claims to notability. After reviewing the second version of the article that was deleted today, it appears that Marjan is notable enough for inclusion, but the key is to state why. If Marjan played internationally for Malaysia, then you need to mention that. If he played professionally, then include for whom he played. You may want to consult Wikipedia:WikiProject Football for help. Let me know if you have any other questions... Caknuck 17:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

The key thing for any article is to clearly state why the person is notable. You can't assume that a reader knows that Chilton was one of England's greatest soccer internationals or that Marjan was playing for the Malaysian national team when he scored those goals. (For instance, England may have been playing a friendly against a club, youth or regional team at the time.)

If you start your article off with something like "Matlan Marjan is a Malaysian professional soccer player who played internationally for Malaysia. Marjan is best known for scoring two goals against Bobby Chilton in a match between Malaysia and England...", then you have immediately made a claim to notability that will prevent speedy deletion.

I have restored the article per your request. Let me know if you have any other concerns or questions. Cheers, Caknuck 05:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Sabah

The date August 31st has already been mentioned in the first paragraph of subsection "Second World War and the road to independence". You are only repeating it. I kindly suggest you reread the whole article prior to your edit to understand why your edit is redundant. And one more thing, while Sabah and Singapore gained self-rule on August 31 1963, Sarawak did not. __earth ^(Talk) 05:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Let me double check on this. I'm pretty sure Brunei did. Although the dates are similar, the circumstances and countries differ. One, I mention Brunei. Another was Self-government. Another, what others believe o be the Date of Independence. All these are different instances occurring on the 31st of august, and not necessarily in 1963. Othmanskn (talk)

I have just made major revisions on the religion in Sabah. There are a lot of fake news on this issue in Sabah because it does not tally with our oral history and personal experiences and education. I tried to refer to my old Geography textbook when in primary school but I cannot find that book, even in Google Books but I was sure that in 1967, 47% of Sabahans were Muslims and the political results point out similar outcome. The apparent large number of Christian dominated seats inn 1985 won by PBS was due to gerrymendering of seats which were done by Berjaya, Harris Salleh with the apporval of Mahathir and exploited by PBS, a Christan dominated party. It was shown in their political campaigns and I had seen these analysis. These are facts that we face in Sabah but I shall find the references to publish them in Wikipedia.

As it turned out, it was due to the blatant evangelical actions of Christian missionaries in falsifying data. Stating that 16.6% of Sabahans were Muslims, while only 37% were Muslims in 1960 is just preposterous. After checking with the most like source of the original census data in 1960, there is no doubt that it was grossly faked by James Wong in 1973, referenced by Caldarola.

The comment from the Colonia officers of British North Borneo should be more reliable than James Wong. Accusations that Colonial officers are actively promoting Christianity is most probably false but these accusations are documented in sources which we should record in Wikipedia, as our historical heritage.

Just as accusations of mass conversions to Islam occured. These should also be recorded and I myself heard rumours of these but personally I have never met any of the affected people because Muslims are always wary of new converts. I have found that facts do not support these accusations and this supports my personal experiences living in Sabah. What I found were non-Muslims with Muslim names. When I asked them, they say they never were Muslims, just use Muslim names because of their respect for Muslim leaders. I suspect they were just trying to win favours with Muslim leaders, as some rumours had stated. Othmanskn (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Malaysia top.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Malaysia top.JPG. The copy called Image:Malaysia top.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Cheeser1 (talk) 02:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Malaysia declaration.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Malaysia declaration.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Malaysia top.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Malaysia top.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Sabahan Demographics of 1967

Othmanskn, where did you get info about Sabahan demographics for 1967? It would be an invaluable resource if you can cite a source.

Furthermore, your allegations against PBS control of delineation is pretty baseless. First of all, delineation is a federal responsibility (via the EC, which by law is under the jurisdiction of the federal government). Secondly, the federal government would not likely have consented to this (imagine UMNO politicians saying "it's alright to have more Christian representatives").

Perhaps you're confusing this with the US federation, where state governments do have the authority to delineate state seats.

Whodhellknew (talk) 12:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

You say that "And I never claimed that PBS had delineated the election boundaries by itself."

But from the Sabah talk pages, you say: "It was the minority Christian PBS party, who started the illegal demography with the concent of the Federal Government, by allocating more representations to much smaller areas and population to Christian representatives."

It doesn't change the fact that the SPR is a federal body. You can claim that Christians were favoured, but the SPR was a federal body. Explain how any party but the federal government of the day could've influenced this delineation.

I found the book you've mentioned. Thank you for the source.

However, it clearly states that a large proportion of the population were animist. During the gap between whichever election you claim to be gerrymandered, there is a great likelihood that a demographic change occurred due to greater Christianisation of the population.

And this wouldn't be state-sanctioned either, since apart from two short years, every chief executive of Sabah was a Muslim.

Whodhellknew (talk) 13:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm also trying to track down the "Report of the Commission of Enquiry, North Borneo and Sarawak" cited by this book.

However, there is as yet, no source for the 1967 census. Your knowledge is not enough. As said, an old geography textbook should not be beyond retrievable. Until then, your stats on the census cannot be used.

Whodhellknew (talk) 13:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

2009 flu pandemic, new WHO press conference available

Hi Othmanskn,

The audio and transcript for the weekly WHO virtual press conference (Dec. 3) is now available. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/multimedia/swineflupressbriefings/en/index.html

Cool Nerd (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Chatting about perpetual motion

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Perpetual motion are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

It's pointless to quibble over the literal meaning of "perpetual motion" v. the meaning commonly associated with the term. Perpetual motion article is about the common meaning. Trying to change it into something else is simply disruptive. Furthermore, though you are adamant about your views, you fail to back them up with reliable sources, so it's really a double fail on your part. Rklawton (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Othmanskn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)