Oskarmandude

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW (Talk) 04:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Oskarmandude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a Vandal, I just made an article called Tails Doll, which is a character in Sonic R. On the Lancelot disambugation page, I linked to Shadow the Hedgehog as he is referred as that in Sonic and the Black Knight. I must be unblocked now.

Accept reason:

I accept most of what you say, and I think that "your account is being used only for vandalism" was mistaken: most of your editing was not vandalism. However, your creation of the article TAILS DOLL certainly was vandalism, so please be careful that you don't do anything like that again, or you are likely to find yourself blocked again and perhaps not unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Nice to see you back after 2 years. What userid have you been using since this block, or have you been editing anonymously instead? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:38, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism v "just did a bad job"

I guess that, after two years, you have forgotten that you created two different articles, Tails doll and TAILS DOLL. Tails doll was a reasonable first go at writing an article. It wasn't a brilliant article, but it was a good deal better than many that I have seen. TAILS DOLL, however, was a different matter. It was unambiguous vandalism, with no two ways about it. However, that was over two years ago, and I hope we can forget about it, and you can move on from here and make good contributions to the encyclopaedia. (I also think that indefinitely blocking you for that one vandalism edit was unnecessary. A warning would have been reasonable, with a block only if you carried on doing the same thing.) JamesBWatson (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)