September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Njd-de. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Muzaffarpur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. NJD-DE (talk) 15:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have a proof you all are written abou is fake tommorow I go to the court filed the case and RTI also thank you so that beacause founder muzaffarpur is my the father of great grand fath in 1885 Osama siraj (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edits on Wikipedia need to be backed by reliable sources - it's not enough to simply have a proof. Furthermore, please familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines that exist on Wikipedia regarding conflicts of interest, as well as the language and style we use in articles (WP:MOS). Also do note, there are multiple ways on resolving disputes here. No need to make legal threats which this community has a strong policy against. As you're a new editor, a good idea would be to head over to the teahouse. NJD-DE (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Online edit-a-thon SDGs September 2020/Tasks, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. EMsmile (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit
 
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 15:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
You wrote "I have a proof you all are written abou is fake tommorow I go to the court filed the case..." which was understood as making a legal threat. If that is not what you did, or what you intended, and perhaps a difficulty with English, then you need to explain, because when read literally it is taken as meaning that you intend to go to court to file a case (lawsuit?) against Wikipedia for having false information. If you want to continue to revise the article in question, the first step will be to appeal the block. The next after that will be to start a discussion on the Talk page of the article, explaining - with references - what you believe to be true about the naming of the city. Your claim that the founder was an ancestor of yours is not sufficient. Wikipedia requires published references as verification. David notMD (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply