Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Smith (June 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TYelliot was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 09:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Onrecordla! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 09:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bizness Boi (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Frank Smith has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frank Smith. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Smith (film executive) (June 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Legacypac (talk) 22:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Walden Media has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Walden Media was changed by Onrecordla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850771 on 2018-07-18T20:22:35+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid editing

edit
 

Hello Onrecordla. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Onrecordla. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Onrecordla|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018

edit
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Onrecordla (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22476 was submitted on Aug 28, 2018 05:04:44. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 05:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bizness Boi has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bizness Boi. Thanks! Yanjipy (talk) 19:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bizness Boi (September 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 04:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bizness Boi

edit
 

Hello, Onrecordla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bizness Boi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Meszzy2 (talk) 09:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply