Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Stable Diffusion into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onetozeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onetozeros (talk) 02:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

removed or improved the contents which are affected the article

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onetozeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onetozeros (talk) 09:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlueMoon AI (January 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lewcm were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lewcm Talk to me! 11:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlueMoon AI (January 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DanCherek was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
DanCherek (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
can you please tell me why this topic is not sufficient? Onetozeros (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because it has not received significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources, and therefore does not meet Wikipedia’s notability threshold. DanCherek (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
In regards to this, please do not remove the submission templates at the top of the draft again. They're there for a reason—if you'd like to ask further regarding the rejection, you can also take a look at the instructions in the yellow box above. Bsoyka (tcg) 15:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlueMoon AI (January 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply