Ondrinn

March 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MER-C 19:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [2] MER-C 20:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

[3] Graham87 08:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ondrinn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My changes from 15 March 2018 have been included new information which have never been on wikipedia before. I have been used the links to Australian company concerning with corresponding issues in good faith. I understand it should seem like promotion but it wasn't my goal. In future I won't use links to companies' websites. Ondrinn (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Adding links to the same company's website to four articles wasn't meant to promote that company? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ondrinn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Some years ago I have been edited an article on wikipedia for the first time and without source. My simple editing was erased with the reason there is no source. Now I am blocked after using similar source in several articles. I think blocking after adding 4 unique information is inadequate punishment. Ondrinn (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Technical decline only, superseded below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Right now people believe that you have a conflict of interest regarding this site - I think that the easiest way out of this would be to promise to never use this or any other unreliable source. What do you think? Max Semenik (talk) 01:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ondrinn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As I wrote before I understand that my editing should seem like promotion of some websites. And I can just repeat my promise I won't use links to companies' websites or any other unreliable source in future. Ondrinn (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've gone and unblocked you per your promises above. Graham87 12:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.