Rhodesia edit

Can you provide me a link to an academic source that documents the existence of the government in exile? Ideally something that examines its history too. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, of course. But do you really believe I do anything here anymore after this witch hunt? Haven’t you just witnessed what happened? I am done with Wikipedia. May you all live with your non-comprehensive knowledge, dictated by the losers and the winners of the bush wars. However, if you manage to leave the circle of reactionaries and other ideologists which pollute the web with their old stories etc., visit libraries in person and meet (!) the officials of the government (yes, one can meet and interview them), you will get everything you ask for. Even copies of the Declaration of Amsterdam. And no, they’re not fascists or racists. They’re astonishingly left-liberal and progressive. They came clear with the past. But here… Good luck! University Professor for History (talk) 18:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Personally, I always wanted to interview Edgar Whitehead or Godfrey Huggins (who both died a few months apart, what?), but I've missed my mark by... well, just a couple of decades. El_C 05:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Arnulf Seminary of Theology for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnulf Seminary of Theology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnulf Seminary of Theology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vahurzpu (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Christian Church International for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Church International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Church International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vahurzpu (talk) 07:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klaus Bells, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vahurzpu (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Klaus Bells per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klaus Bells. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - TheresNoTime 😺 15:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply