January 2021 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ijaz Ahmed Shah have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ijaz Ahmed Shah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — The Earwig talk 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omarcheema1996, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Steve M (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — The Earwig talk 22:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply