Olico2

Hi please have olico2 protected. I have experienced repeated vandalism and would like to prevent that from happening. Thanks!

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Please Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olico2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am accused of being a sockpuppet of nedgreiner. While I know him personally, I am not a sockpuppet. You will see that i do have him on my watch list, but only because he is a friend and because we have both experienced vandilism from three connected accounts, user:Patrickmaco user:thepattymaco and user:ned-maco. If you look at my contributions, you will see that i do not vandalize pages, I only try to add more information. Please review this ASAP. thankyou, Olico2

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olico2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My previous request to be unblocked was denied, but I assure you I am not a sock puppet and I do not use sock puppets. Also the user that reported user:nedgreiner and myself, user:vernapenny, is actually a sockpuppet administered by user:nedgreiner. I apologize for leaving this information out of my previous request, but hope that with this added information you will reconsider. Thank you.

Decline reason:

We already know about Vernapenny, as they were blocked at the same time you were. "I am not a sock" is pretty much what everyone says - you'll need to provide a much more convincing explanation than that, seeing as CheckUser verified that you and Nedgreiner are one and the same. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olico2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have already asked twice. Please unblock this account. I was unfairly blocked in May 2014 for being a "sockpuppet" of nedgreiner and would like this to be reviewed. I actually like to contribute to wikipedia and have never vandalized a page. Please consider this and do not immediately answer this with a no. thanks, Olico2

Decline reason:

In your previous unblock request, you admitted knowing about sockpuppetry involving nedgreiner, which is suspicious. Also, there is checkuser evidence. In addition, there is the observation by Origamite, below. Overall, taking all of this evidence into account, I have decided to deny your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for being a sock with checkuser. That means that your IP address and method of logging on were found to be similar, so it's not an unfair block. I do have to wonder, however, about this diff by your friend, which would connect the names of the vandals of your userpage to you. Food for thought. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 23:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)