You have been banned. Do you understand this? Don't invent stupid excuses for blaming me, I am just ensuring the current policy, battling against disruptive behaviours like yours. Neapolitans are friends of mine, as well as all Southern Italians. By the way, that article was about Maltese things, so what's the matter with Naples? --Angelo 02:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- you do not find it odd that suddenly when palermo beat napoli that you then start removing edits from a fan of them?? well you didn't before, you just blocked me, but now you're remove all the edits. it doesn't seem such a stupid excuse... and what is there to battle against?? distruptive is improving things??
- I could understand if i were vandalising, but i'm not so isn't it just a waste of time. i can understand the other guy doing that because he uses this as a toy, but i thought you atleast had some intelligence and was interested in one thing, the same as me, building information here. but it seems you have turned into the same deletionist as he.
- and by the way, if Malta is only a few miles from Sicily, why go out of your way to Yamalize their articles? hardly logical.- Ohdearbadidea 02:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've tried to talk with you, but you proved you just didn't care. You're still opening socks and playing your stupid game, and this is not fair. You've fooled us way enough, so now it's time for you to stay away from this place. The door is always open in case you understand your mistakes and say sorry, but I sincerely doubt you might do it. I know where Malta is, my grand-grandfather was from there. --Angelo 03:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually I listened to you and even tried to bring about a reasonable solution[1], but that was just ignored and all that earned me was getting my page put on protected for so called "trolling". The sockpuppets are not a game intented to annoy or even to distrupt Wikipedia, they are a legitamate way of trying to carry on adding perfectly useful information.
What you do not seem to understand is that there are two schools of ways on Wikipedia that editors come here for... 1) to add information, just interested in learning (what this place is supposed to be for) 2) to become part of the hierarchy "game", these people generally do not add content or build, just sit around refreshing "recent changes" until they've reverted enough "vandalism" or caught enough "sockpuppets" to ass kiss their way into adminship... that is the Yamla, Gscshoyru, class of thought.
Now the latter never interested me at all, so if some weasel decided to place a banning on me (Yamla) then as my content editing is non-distruptive, I don't even consider leaving. Sure sockpuppets may technically be "wrong" (even that can be avoided by WP:Ignore all rules), but you cannot try to claim this is a malicious "game" or an attempt at "distruption", because that is just not the way of things in reality. - Ohdearbadidea 03:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- If you'd really listened to me, you would have tried to understand the reasons for which you were banned. Your usage of sockpuppets is definitely not legitimate here, regardless of your good faith, so all an admin can do is to block you at sight by now. You're forbidden to edit here because of your ban, and if you want it to be revoked you must prove all of us you've fully understood your mistakes. And your recent behaviour, with all the socks and the personal attacks, is not exactly the right way to do so. Can you prove us you can be a good and collaborative editor in the long run? --Angelo 03:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- When I have no blocks no socks are used, and I collaborate openly in projects, help to build, never vandalize content, open discussions to invite others to work with, so surely that speaks in itself for proof of good value in the long run? If I was unblocked i'd have no use for socks anyway (my main violation)... and I guess I could change my attitude to bite my tongue more in certain instances. How am I supposed to prove anything more when even my proposal of Wikipedia:Mentorship (which ensures no way of distruption) was turned down?? - Ohdearbadidea 03:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Congrats for your part in letting that faggot Thompson ruin Wikipedia.
- All I'm doing is to apply the current Wikipedia policies. So come on, keep on breaking WP:NPA... I am protecting this page, you're no longer welcome here. --Angelo 21:31, 11 November 2007 (UTC)