Speedy deletion nomination of Sissy Rich edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Sissy Rich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Anome (talk) 19:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 19:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficialSissyRich (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi im new to Wiki and unfortunately when trying to add a image (which was not an advertisement)i used a html code not knowing that would throw up and red flag leading me to be blocked. If i had known i definitely wouldnt have done it!! Since being blocked i found out the correct way to add images to a wiki post at "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial" . I would really appreciate being unblocked. I can assure you that this definitely will not happen again ! Thanks. have a nice day :)

Decline reason:

You seem to have misunderstood the reason for your block. It is not about the image, it was about the entire page you created, which was blatantly promotional which we don't allow. Your username suggests you are related to SissyRich, you should be aware that we do not allow role accounts, we want editors who are here for the benefit of the project, not to further their own aims Jac16888 Talk 19:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.